Follow GuyMacPherson on Twitter
Showing posts with label David Cross. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Cross. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Bob & David interview


Bob Odenkirk & David Cross
January 30, 2012
 "People that love Mr. Show, love it so much they watch it real closely and get way into it. So there’s a place in their mind where we’re standing next to each other on stage doing a show." – Bob Odenkirk

"People always ask me, 'When are you and Bob going to do something? Are you ever going to do something again?' There never really is an assumption that we had a falling out or anything. I think people understand we have these two separate lives and we live on two different coasts. But we’re always looking to get together and work again." – David Cross

Publicist: Bob and David are both on the line. I will give you about a  three-minute heads-up when you’re almost ready and done.
GM: Alright.
David Cross: Can you give me a five-minute warning on the three-minute heads-up? Is that cool?
Bob Odenkirk: And I need somebody to call ‘places’.

GM: Places! Here we go.
BO: Okay, I’m here. I’m in my costume.

GM: How are you guys?
BO: Good.

GM: I was thinking, all you’ve done as individuals over the years yet you’re still kind of connected. It’s always Bob & David.
BO: Well, I mean legally we are, but is that what you mean?

GM: Yeah, legally. No, with the fans. You’re a comedy team even though you haven’t worked together in years except for occasionally. You’re still that to a lot of people.
DC: You can speak for yourself, Bob, but I don’t think we ever considered ourselves a comedy team in the classic kind of Martin & Lewis, Abbott & Costello, Nichols & May way.
BO: I think myself alone, I’m Abbott & Costello.
DC: I’m actually half of a person so we’re two and a half people, which predates Two and a Half Men by a good decade. But people always ask me, whenever I do any press for anything, or if I’m just in a bar, “When are you and Bob going to do something? Are you ever going to do something again?” There never really is an assumption that we had a falling out or anything. I think people understand we have these two separate lives and we live on two different coasts. But we’re always looking to get together and work again.
BO: Also the people that love Mr. Show, they love it so much that they watch it real closely and they get way into it. So there’s a place in their mind where we’re standing next to each other on stage doing a show.

GM: I read an interview with you two in Vanity Fair. I think it was pretty recent. It really drove home the point that entertainment is so fractured. Because in my world, everybody knows Mr. Show. You guys were talking about how it’s a business and it was a cult show, so you understand why it got cancelled. I turn on a network talk show or Saturday Night Live and I have no clue who the lead guest is. So it’s always a bit jarring when a Mr. Show or Arrested Development gets cancelled.
DC: That’s because you keep watching Mr. Show over and over and over again. Your point of reference is from the mid- to late-nineties. Justin Bieber wasn’t even born yet. You’ve really got to get out there and peruse a couple Us Weekly’s.
BO: I agree, Guy. I think there are so many channels that entertainment itself is split into a million billion pieces and you can just be well known in one and not known at all in the others.

GM: It seems like a disconnect, though. It seems like it’s more popular; it’s not just a cult thing.
BO: You work in the comedy scene. So I don’t know. What’s the biggest thing you’ve done, David? Chipmunks?
DC: Oh, easily.
BO: I’d say Breaking Bad is hugely bigger than Mr. Show.
DC: Oh, by far. Definitely.

GM: But do they know you as Bob Odenkirk or is it, “That’s Saul. That’s that guy.”
BO: They go Saul Goodman. They don’t know me at all.

GM: And by the way, my son loved the Chipmunk movie.
DC: Well, that’s who it’s for. So that’s good.
BO: Perfect.

GM: Your website is gone, you guys. What happened there?
BO: That was my fuck-up. That was my fault. I don’t understand how it works. I don’t know what a server is or why you have to pay somebody for it or where you pay or how you contact them. So what happened was the subscription ran out, I guess. Is that what it’s called? And I guess some companies just buy random sites and then they put their information up. So if you go to bobanddavid.com… I’m going to go there right now and look. They’re selling pharmaceuticals or something. I’m going to go see it. Hold on… (to himself, typing) bobanddavid.com… Something happened to it… Oh, it’s for sale! Holy shit! You guys, it says it’s for sale!
DC: How much?
BO: I wonder how much. You’re right, they’re going to try to get loads of money out of us. So some shitty company did that to us. They just grabbed it up.

GM: Any plans to relaunch another one?
BO: You know, I have a site of my own that I barely keep up. I don’t really know what to do with a website so I just can’t do it.
DC: I think, for myself – and this probably has a lot to do with my age and my background as a stand-up – just writing anonymously in a vacuum where people comment their own stupid bullshitty things where they’re trying to be funny or mean or whatever, is not appealing to me in any way. Whatever I would throw out there on Twitter ­– and I don’t have a Twitter account or a website or Facebook – I’d rather just say it on stage or write it down somewhere else other than this. It’s just not very appealing to me, the kind of fleeting, empty, not a real kind of interaction. And I think that probably has something to do with my age and [being a] stand-up.

GM: You guys are doing Mr. Show here in Vancouver.
DC: No-no-no-no.

GM: But you’re doing sketches.
DC: It’s important to make that distinction. Bob and I are hosting the gala at the festival. There will be stand-ups. We’ll be fucking around. We’ll be doing some kind of very loose sketch stuff but it is not in any way, shape, or form Mr. Show.
BO: David and I have done a lot of this stuff, too, before we did Mr. Show and during Mr. Show and after. Like David said, it’s loose kind of sketch-like improvisational scenes and some hosting duties that, again, are us goofing around and having a good time. We have ideas and pieces we’re going to do. It’s not like we’re just riffing up there. But yeah, it’s not a constructed Mr. Show. And we have guests who are great. We have amazing guests that Will Davis let us choose. These people are all people that we love and want to share with the audience.
DC: It’ll be great and a lot of fun and people will be happy but they should know they’re not getting a Mr. Show revival at all. We’re hosting, we’ll be doing stuff, and it’s important for people to know that going into it otherwise they’d be, I think, seriously disappointed. But it will be a really fun show.
BO: John Ennis from Mr. Show will be there. And we have Josie Long from England. She’s an awesome comic. And Nick Thune from America. Marc Maron, who’s an old friend of both of ours, will be tearing it up with the introspection. You know who’s on the show?

GM: Who else?
BO: Chelsea Peretti. I thought maybe you had a list. Matt Braunger. David, do you know Matt?
DC: Yes. And these guys will be doing stand-up, you know? And Bob and I will be interacting. It’s that kind of show.
BO: We’re going to heckle. Garfunkle & Oates are on the show, too. You know Garfunkle & Oates?

GM: Yeah.
BO: So it’s a great show. I mean, if it was just those acts it would be an amazing show. But then you add in that David and I are going to be SCREWING AROUND ­ – put that in bold caps – with John Ennis, and there’s a chance, I’m just going to warn you, that there will be a reunion of April Wine.
DC: A slight chance. We’re working on it. Fingers crossed. No guarantees but that’s something we’re working on.

GM: This show is specifically written for Vancouver, right? It’s not something you’re doing elsewhere.
DC: Specifically for Vancouver. It’s a one-off. It’s only for Vancouver. We’ll be doing it in the Vancouverosian language so even people from America won’t understand it. It’s specifically for Vancouver. There will be Jap-a-dogs and Granville Island pops.
BO: And if anybody from outside Vancouver tries to enjoy the show, we’re going to have some surprises for them that aren’t going to be real pleasant.
DC: Yeah, there’ll be an alarm that goes off, too, that will isolate them and highlight them and they’ll be escorted out in a very brusque manner.

"Anybody, your bestest buddy in the world is going to irritate you in some way or fashion. Working on those shows was very, very intense." – David Cross

GM: I heard talk of Mr. Show 2.0. Is that something you’d like to get off the ground?
BO: You know, we don’t really talk about that. We did a show together for HBO three years ago that was kind of neat but it wasn’t really Mr. Show 2.0; it was a pretty different show.
DC: I think you might be referring to our conversation about that experience about how we went to HBO after that. We tried to put that show together and we sort of pitched this idea and we used the term – or somebody else actually used the term – Mr. Show 2.0 because that’s kind of a shortcut to describe what it was, which was Bob and I doing sketches. It wasn’t Mr. Show but I think that’s what you might be referring to.
BO: Oh, yeah, yeah. We did have a pitch to them of a pretty loose kind of sketch show that we offered to do that they passed on. But we still like writing together and performing together so you never know what’s going to happen. But right now if you like us and us working together you gotta go to Vancouver and go to the gala.

GM: Clearly you don’t get on each others’ nerves when you work so irregularly together. But when you were working together all the time, was there stuff about each other that just drove you nuts?
BO: Oh, sure.
DC: But that’s going to happen to anybody. You know, when we’re working together we’re not 9 to 5 and then going home; we were working ten, twelve, fourteen hours a day, sometimes six days a week. Anybody, your bestest buddy in the world is going to irritate you in some way or fashion. Working on those shows was very, very intense. And Bob and I had a lot of roles. It wasn’t just acting or writing and producing and editing; it was all those things all the time. Plus dealing with a lot of kind of precious personalities within our writers and actors and stuff. Including ourselves. But nothing titillating.

GM: You guys are also going to be on the live WTF. I know you’ve been on it individually in the past. And you’ve known Marc for a long time. Are you surprised that he’s the guy to bring the comedy community together?
BO: I’m not surprised. I think Marc has got a good vibe for getting people to sort of relax and talk seriously. As much fun as it is to joke around in interviews and stuff, which is really a lot of fun and a natural thing to want to do, it’s also, I guess, kind of cool for people who are fans of comedy to kind of get to know the comedians as people. And he’s just very good at that. I’m glad people noticed he was good at it. And I think podcasts and what they are and how people enjoy them is particularly conducive to what Marc does, which is taking his time and hanging out. Even a talk show on TV, they kind of rush through their five minutes and they have a job, which is usually to plug a movie or a TV show. You don’t really get to know people. And I learned recently that people who listen to podcasts want them to be longer. They want them to be as long as they can be. A lot of times they’re listening on a drive so it just lends itself to taking your time and having a conversation. And Marc’s great at that. He’s like a therapist but he has no degree.

GM: Yeah, he’s like the modern-day Dr. Katz.
DC: I agree with everything Bob said. I might be a little surprised – I don’t know if that’s the right word – that he took the mantle and ran with it, but he’s kind of the perfect guy for it. That makes total sense.

GM: I agree. I haven’t missed a show since the beginning. But what I mean is you’ve known him from when he was more of a prickly character and if you were thinking of him back then…
DC: No, for sure. Before he sobered up and everything, but that was a long, long time ago. I never would have guessed in a million years first of all that podcasts would be invented – I would have had to be very prescient for that – that he’d be the guy. But once he sobered up and everything, yeah, it makes total sense.

 "Dennis was a very early supporter of the show. There were a handful of guys – Garry Shandling specifically, and Bill Maher and Dennis Miller – who went into HBO and said, 'This show is great. You gotta pick it up. You gotta keep it on.'" – David Cross

GM: I saw a video of you guys when Mr. Show was first coming on the air and you were on the old Dennis Miller show. David, you’ve talked about him since. You seemed to get along so well back then. Have you run into him since?
DC: Dennis was a very early supporter of the show. There were a handful of guys – Garry Shandling specifically, and Bill Maher and Dennis Miller – who went into HBO and said, “This show is great. You gotta pick it up. You gotta keep it on.” I don’t really know Dennis personally beyond that world. And I’ve really met him maybe three times. Whatever my feeling about his politics and his stance, that’s separate from those other things. But I haven’t seen him in a long time. Also, I live in New York and he lives in Santa Barbara. Bob might have run into him since then, I don’t know.
BO: Yeah, I don’t know. I don’t see Dennis. I did actually listen to his radio show but he was talking to a bunch of Saturday Night Live people that I knew. So that was neat. But I guess he’s like a right wing guy now. I don’t really know.
DC: Who did he endorse? He came out and endorsed Cain. Herman Cain, with literally zero ideas; just a bunch of silly rhetoric and blustering. So, yeah.
BO: I don’t know what’s happening with him. I can’t really comment on him. He was always very nice to me and gave me opportunities to perform on his talk show. Before I was even at Saturday Night Live, he would do jokes that I sent to him, which was really cool and meant a lot. When you’re waiting tables it’s neat to see your stuff make it on the air.

GM: A couple years ago I saw his stand-up and it was refreshing to see that in his whole hour-long set maybe only five minutes was political. So what we see on the talk shows is horrendous but…
DC: He has a radio show, too. A syndicated, five days a week radio show and the majority of it is political so it’s out there. Again, you can agree with it or not or think it’s funny or not, it’s all subjective.
BO: I like listening to Glenn Beck.
DC: They have a country & western duo.
BO: Have you ever listened to him, David?
DC: Not on his radio show, no.
BO: It’s the best. It’s so funny. It’s craziness.
DC: Personally I’m a Mark Levin fan because of the way he talks…
BO: Yeah.
DC: Because of his faux-quick to anger, his righteous indignation. He ramps up. He goes from zero to a hundred in seconds. He’ll hang up on a caller and just go off and it’s all kind of premeditated. Or if not premeditated, he’s just putting on a show. He cracks me up. Mark Levin is I think my favourite of all those guys.

GM: And before we get hung up on, is the large part of the draw in coming to Vancouver the other guests Will brings in? It’s a nice hang for you guys.
BO: It’s a great hang, yeah. I’m going to bring my daughter with me. We love that city. And then of course these comics. Yeah, it’s a big attraction for us. I haven’t seen Josie Long since I saw her in Montreal about nine years ago. Or maybe it was about six years ago. I don’t even get to see a lot of these comics regularly. I see Nick Thune at the UCB. So yeah, getting to see the acts that we love and the fact that they let us choose who’s on the gala was a great plus for us. For me.
DC: Not for me. I’m just about Japadog and that’s it. That really is all I’m interested in. And, I don’t know, there’s an okay poutine place in the West End. That’s about it.

GM: I heard Japadog has expanded to New York.
DC: Yeah, St. Mark’s.
BO: What is it?
DC: Japadog, I think I might have told you this, is the best hot dog you’re ever going to have. They just have a few carts and then there’s that one small place where you walk through a door. It’s the best hot dog you’ll ever have. And they just opened one up here in New York on St. Mark’s.
BO: Okay, I’ll check it out.
DC: The end.

GM: The end. Thanks a lot, guys.
BO: Hey, Guy, thank you.
DC: Okay.
BO: See you at the show.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

World's Biggest Asshole

Now who would that be? I couldn't begin to name one. But Scott Aukerman happily gave us his vote when he visited the What's So Funny? studios back in September of 2009. Run the clip, Kevin:



If you missed it the first time, you can listen to the whole episode here or download it at iTunes.

Monday, May 31, 2010

VHS Vault: Dane Cook

Well, look what we have here. It's a youngish Dane Cook performing at the Just For Laughs gala. This is about the time I first saw him and I liked him at the time. As you can see here, he had potential. Sure, he played the nostalgia card pretty heavily, but there were jokes there. I still laugh when I hear his mom explaining the cat noises.

I read an interview with David Cross in pitchfork.com today and he had some comments on Cook that I think are bang-on accurate:
I don't have any rivalry with Dane Cook. I've been on record as saying I don't think he's nearly as bad at stand-up as everybody says. He doesn't suck. What I find distasteful is his constant self-promotion, which just smacks of a wounded little kid, like: "Look at me! You guys think I'm funny, right? Hey, I've got a million Facebook friends! That makes me good, right?" That's what I don't like. And he steals material. He's just that guy right now. Ten years ago it was Carrot Top. Ten years before that it was Andrew Dice Clay. There'll always be a very successful comic who you're like, "Really guys?" But to say that he's not funny or a bad comic is disingenuous.
Take a look at this era of Dane Cook and you can see what he had going for him. It would still be a few years before he really hit it with mainstream audiences, but you can see why he was popular.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

David Cross

I told you there'd be additions and subtractions to the comedy festival. Turns out the two Matts (Besser and Walsh) won't be able to make it afterall, which is a shame because they're great. And old friend David Cross will be making a return visit.

David Cross and I go way back. I've never interviewed him either over the phone or in person. And I've never met him (except once even before I was writing about comedy regularly I saw him at a Nashville Pussy show at Richard's on Richards and said hi). But I've been a fan ever since I saw him at Bumbershoot years and years ago. I think Patton Oswalt, Laura Kightlinger and Tenacious D were also on the bill. Can't remember who else.

So I've been a big fan. Then two years ago I had to do a festival round-up for the Straight. I took in tons of shows but I didn't have tons of space to go into much depth. But I gave a less-than-stellar review to Cross's stand-up. I wrote:
Probably the most famous name at the fest was David Cross, who gained mass appeal with his role as Tobias on Arrested Development, but his was a mixed bag. Doing standup, he's just an angry know-it-all who appears to hate his time on-stage almost as much as he hates his fans. Appearing last in the almost-three-hour Comedy Death Ray show, Cross insulted First Nations people and drug addicts before going on a seemingly endless–and humourless–rant about Mormonism, hemming and hawing his way through an ill-prepared set. But what a pleasure it was to watch him the next night in Match Game, where he smiled, laughed, and enjoyed himself, and in the SKETCH Show on September 22, also at the Cultch, where he was reunited with former Mr. Show partner Bob Odenkirk.
The thing about reviewing is you can only review the show you've seen, not the body of work. Re-reading my review above, I see that I shouldn't have used the present tense, because I don't think he's always an angry know-it-all. But I definitely thought he was for the two shows I saw him that year. That was my impression, at least, and I spoke to other comedy nerds who loved the guy but didn't at all like his festival sets. And, to be fair, I also spoke to others who did like his stand-up there. But I can only give my opinion when I review. I just try not to give cheap shots, say my piece, and move on. I also mentioned how much I enjoyed him during the Match Game and in his sketch show.

Well, Dave read my review and commented on it in his blog. Fair enough. Critics have to be able to take it just like they dish it out. I have no problem with that. To rebut my criticism, he wrote:
Hmmm, well, I don’t hate my fans, nor do I hate doing stand-up. I’m sorry if I gave (or give) that impression, but as I said, I genuinely like doing it. That’s why I flew to Vancouver for the shows. And I actually like it when people like my act. Not too surprising really. I certainly don’t do it for the money. 7 shows for a thousand bucks total is not very lucrative. I made more money middling at “The Laugher’s Den” in Made-Up-Town, New Hampshire. It’s true though; I did insult drug-users, specifically heroin addicts. So, sorry junkies. Also I did insult a “First Nationer”, or “drunk Indian” as I called her. It was after she stood up in her chair, and yelled out that she didn’t have a TV to a rhetorical question I asked. Then, I guessed that she was a drunk Indian, which it turns out was correct. She wasn’t insulted (at least not then – she waited for me after the show to drunkenly apologize in a drunk Indian way). I then talked about drunk Indians for a minute. I am not angry about drunk Indians at all by the way, I find them adorable.
That was his take and it's good he clarified that he does, indeed, like doing stand-up (or at least doesn't hate it) and likes (or at least doesn't hate) his fans, and he's sorry if he gave that impression. Good to know. Seriously. Who knows, he could have been having a shitty week or whatever. Hopefully if I get to review him this year, I'll be able to give him a better review. Because, as I said, I really do like him.

As for his recollection of the drunk Indian bit, I think his memory is selective. He did the same bit twice. There were two different shows. One at the Comedians of Comedy at the Cultch and the second one at the show where someone yelled out at the Commodore. So he wasn't just reacting to someone in the crowd.

Anyway, here's what I didn't like about his rebuttal:
Here, from the same article is an example of the kind of humor Guy enjoys:

"Former locals Irwin Barker and Darryl Lenox got me all nostalgic about the good old days when we could see these two pros just about any day of the week. Lenox talked about his girlfriend's hippie parents, who served him porridge for breakfast: "I didn't even know that shit was real." And Barker, who's suffering from cancer, is still writing gems: "I bought the book France for Dummies because I've always wanted to see Buckingham Palace."

Well, there you go.

I didn't like it for a couple of reasons. No doubt he's never seen Irwin Barker or Darryl Lenox, who are great comics and well-respected by their peers, so he doesn't need to slag them by way of me. Now, I know he didn't overtly slag them; he just said I enjoy that kind of humour and his is different and he didn't offer any opinion. But we can all read between the lines. He probably just thought they were lame examples of jokes I gave but he should know jokes don't always translate well to the page. Sure, I could have done a better job summing them up in one sentence each, but... uh... deadlines. That's my excuse.

But the other reason I didn't like it is because he's doing some nifty editing. In that same review, I led by saying Paul F. Tompkins (who Cross certainly does know and like) was the highlight of the festival for me, and that Jimmy Pardo (another Cross crony) was another highlight. So they were also examples of the kind of humour I enjoy. And I even mentioned enjoying Cross as Cross in Match Game and as characters in sketch. So to slough me off as a guy who just doesn't get his style of stand-up isn't really accurate.

Still with Cross, I was reading an interview with one of my favourites, Doug Stanhope, the other day. It seems Stanhope might have the same impression of Cross that I had back in 2007:
With Bill Maher, I agree with the majority of things he says, and I hate him. He just comes across as so cunty, and smarmy, that curled up sarcasm … and too many guys on that side of the fence do that. That David Cross kind of delivery of, “I’m smarter than you,” not “We’re smarter than them.”
I agree with that notion completely and have been saying it for years, that just because I agree with a comic politically or socially doesn't make me like their comedy. As I said, I do like David Cross, although I get what Doug's saying here. But I feel exactly that way about Bill Maher. Yes, I agree with almost all he says, but I don't find him funny. I used to, back when he was a young comic on The Tonight Show.

It's funny because for ever I've been saying that Doug Stanhope is a guy I disagree with 90 percent of the time, yet find him hilarious.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

June 14: Nardwuar the Human Serviette

Our run of stand-up comic-free shows comes to an end with a real departure for What's So Funny? tonight. Our guest tonight isn't a comedian of any kind, although he's always made me laugh. It's the infamous Nardwuar the Human Serviette. He's from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, but he's known throughout the land as the most distinctive, fill-in-the-blank interview voice of his generation, or any other. I believe the world can be divided into two groups: those that get him and those that don't. Among those he's interviewed that get him are the likes of David Cross, N.E.R.D., and Kurt Cobain. Among those that don't are celebs like Ernest Angley, Alice Cooper and Mikhail Gorbachev.

No one does as much research going into an interview as Nardwuar. David Cross called it "thorough, in-depth and unnecessary research." He usually imparts gifts to his subjects, something I've never done. Also, what I've written here is about the extent of my research. Boy, is he going to be disappointed on the other side of the mic. But my pace is, er, less frantic so we'll fill the hour.

Nardwuar is going to bring in some clips of interviews with people such as Snoop Doggedy-Dog (that's it, right?) and the late hippie Timothy Leary and then we'll break off into discussion and get to know the story behind the interviews. We'll also play some of his beloved rock'n'roll music from his band The Evaporators. Like I say, a departure for us but it'll be fun. The Evaporators, by the way, are playing with Andrew W.K. on Tuesday, June 23, at Neptoon Records on Main St. at 4 p.m. and at the Biltmore on Kingsway at 8 p.m.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

The role of the critic

Came across a very interesting article in the New Zealand Herald today. In it, comic Rhys Darby takes comedy reviewers to task for giving away the punchlines in their reviews.

Darby, who plays the manager on Flight of the Conchords, called the practice "rude" and "lazy" and the reviewers plagiarists.

Let's see. Rude? Not unless their fans are, too, for repeating a good bit by a comic they like. You can talk all you want about why a comic is funny, but unless you can illustrate by way of example, you're not going to win any converts over.

Lazy? It depends on the review and reviewer, I'd think. If all they did was itemize the gags without any other insight, then I'd agree with Darby. But if they use one or two or three punchlines, with the precise wording the comic used while providing ample context, to demonstrate how and why the comedy worked, I wouldn't call them lazy at all.

Plagiarists? Uh, hardly. Plagiarism is the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own. Just like I did there with the dictionary definition. If the critic is citing the comedian, it can't be plagiarism.

But the subject is a fascinating one. Many times, it's the editors who demand specific examples of the jokes. My own rule of thumb is that unless I've got the wording exactly right, I won't quote a joke. And I don't want to give away too much. I don't think citing – at most – three jokes from a headliner is egregious. Presumably they have more than a handful of jokes in a set. The goal is to take a representative sample and also, if you can, show why it works or doesn't work for you.

Key words: "for you". It should never be forgotten, by either the critic, the comic or the crowd, that a review is just one person's opinion. It may be a slightly more informed opinion, but an opinion none the same. When I see a show that does nothing for me, but I'm sitting around hundreds of people who are all laughing hysterically, I feel it's incumbent upon me to mention that so the reader can think, "Hmm, it doesn't sound like it was a very good show. On the other hand, everyone else seemed to love it, so maybe the answer is somewhere in between." And then they can decide for themselves whether to check out that artist the next chance they get or not.

Check out this quote from Darby:
"There is a way to review live comedy and that's not the way. If I don't stand up and say it no one will. Comedians won't say it because they'll end up getting a bad review, or they'll be too scared."
I can't speak for other critics, but there's no way anything personal should ever get in the way of a professional review. Whether I like or dislike a comic personally has no effect whatsoever on what I think of their act. If someone wants to criticise me (and they have), I totally get it. Anyone who puts himself out there in the public eye, whether it be standup or critic, has to expect that not everyone's going to love what they do. Of course, I'll defend myself if I think they're wrong about what I do, but I appreciate the fact they're open with me about their opinions.

Here's an example. I once gave a stinky review to Brad Garrett. He then went on the Tonight Show and quoted from my review, and went on to make fun of me. I actually thought that was way funnier than his act. But if he comes to town again, I'd love to see him. He's a naturally funny guy and I've liked him for a long time. There was nothing personal about my review of his show. (See my rebuttal to his Tonight Show appearance here.)

Similarly I gave a less than positive review to one standup show by David Cross, while, at the same time, giving him kind words about his sketch show. He took me to task in a blog he wrote. Okay, he disagreed with me. Big whup. I like David Cross and have liked his standup. If he comes again, I'd hope I like his new show.

What's your opinion on what Darby said? Or Cross or Garrett, for that matter? Are they just overly-sensitive artists? Or do they have a point? What do you like to see in a comedy review?

Anybody? You there, in the back...