Follow GuyMacPherson on Twitter

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Brent Butt interview

I had a good long talk with Brent Butt a few weeks ago, ahead of his Almost a Movie Star standup tour. We met at a Kitsilano coffee shop and talked about his upcoming movie, No Clue, which opens up in a theatre near you on March 7. We talked about his standup and his childhood. We talked about other comedians. There's lots here.

Brent Butt


January 8, 2014

"I remember having this thought to myself when I was 18: This is all just shit that I have to do because I can't just lay down and wait for a comedy club to open up. I have to do other things. But this is all just killing time till I can start doing standup." – Brent Butt

Guy MacPherson: Exciting times for Brent Butt.
Brent Butt: It is. It’s some exciting times.

GM: The ‘Almost a Movie Star’ tour. Once you’re a movie star, we can’t be meeting in public places.
BB: Exactly. Once we determine what my net worth is… I can’t wait for that info to come out! Then we’ll go meet on a yacht or something.

GM: Did you watch the latest Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee?
BB: No. There’s a new batch now, eh?

GM: It’s fantastic. Louis C.K. And instead of going to a coffee shop, they go on Louis’ yacht.
BB: Now why the hell wouldn’t they go for coffee?

GM: He made coffee on the boat.
BB: I’m against that.

GM: And there was a cartoon!
BB: I’m against that. Why do you monkey around with something that’s working? Because somebody said we could get more people to watch this. I don’t know. The purity of it is what made it great. The whole idea is just two funny people talking. And that’s supposed to be enough. That’s the idea behind it.

GM: And big-name guests. Although this season they have Patton Oswalt and Todd Barry, who aren’t exactly household names.
BB: Todd Barry is one of the greats on Twitter. He busts me up on Twitter. Talking about how great he is and then participating in the trending topics in a glib, superficial way. And he usually twists them around to be about him.

GM: Back to you, though.
BB: Let’s talk more about how great Todd Barry is!

GM: Anyway, big tour coming up. Big movie. I saw the trailer. Loved it.
BB: Thank you. I’m very happy with the trailer. And I’m very happy with the response from the crowd when it had its premiere at the Whistler Film Festival. That was its World Premiere.


GM: So you were happy that the laughs came at the right places.
BB: Yeah, yeah. The laughs came early and often. I was happy with how it turned out but you don’t know really until it gets out in front of people. There were a couple scenes, even when I wrote the movie – because as you know I didn’t want to make a goofy, zany comedy; I wanted it to be realistic and I wanted it to be kinda dark and gritty like a real murder mystery, and it happens to be funny because of things my character says or he’s in over his head. But I didn’t want zany comedy. I didn’t want, like, the detective climbing up a ladder and it starts to go backwards. In my mind, that was the exact type of thing I could see in a detective comedy – and probably have seen in a detective comedy – and it was the perfect example of what I didn’t want my movie to be. So the result is I was happy throughout the scripting even, but there were a couple places where I thought the two are butting up against each other. Comedy and drama.

There were a couple situations where I wondered if one is going to kneecap the other. Like, is my character saying something funny in the middle of this serious situation going to take away the gravity of it? Or vice versa, is the gravity of the situation going to kneecap the joke so that one or neither works. Then when we shot it, I was happy with how it went. I thought it really worked. But again, you gotta get it up in front of people. You don’t know until it gets in front of people. They’re the ones who’ll tell you. One of the scenes specifically I was really waiting to see how it would work. And it was perfect. The scene was quiet because it was quite a tense scene, and everybody was hanging on it. My character says a funny thing, there’s a laugh, and then it stops and goes back to the seriousness of it. That was exactly what I’d hoped would happen. That was the exact response I wanted. So we were over the moon at the screening.

GM: Is a lot of it in editing and direction?
BB: It can always be ruined. Conversely, something that doesn’t seem that funny on the page can be made funnier. So yeah, it’s all got to sync up. In order for it to work really well, the best situations are when it’s there on the page, it gets shot well, it gets performed well, and gets edited properly.

GM: Were you in there for the editing process?
BB: It’s done in stages. The editor assembles it just as the editor sees it; no real input. I mean, there’s a few notes. When it’s being filmed, the director will say to the script supervisor after a take, “I like that take. Circle that take.” So the editor basically builds the movie as the editor thinks it should be, bearing in mind the notes from the director. But in terms of shots, you kind of let the editor do it. And that’s what you want from an editor. I generally find the best editors are editors. Directors are good at editing, and some producers and writers are good at editing, but editors are terrific editors. They’ve done it a lot. They have a real sense of flow. It’s not so much hands-off as you show me how you see it. We’ve given you all this material that we think is good and we think we’ve done our job so now we would love to see how you, a skilled editor, build the show.

And it’s really interesting because almost always the transitions are different than how you imagined. Often in your mind you imagine it in a very linear fashion. You imagine a wide establishing shot, a medium shot and then you go into some coverage. Especially if you’re writing it, you’re often just thinking in terms of what information do I have to get out. So when I do that I think of it in a very nuts and bolts kind of way. And then when you see the editor’s assembly, you go, ‘Oh, he started on the close-up of the hand! That’s great! If you’d given me ten years I wouldn’t have thought to start that way.’ So that’s what an editor brings to the table. So it’s done in stages. The editor assembles it. Then the director goes in and sits down with the editor and says, ‘Make the following changes. I think the scene is nice but needs to be faster. Or I really don’t like starting on the moving shot.’ So you make those changes. And then after that it’s my job to come in. Everybody has a different way of working and my thing is if you come in long, which you always do or always should, I don’t want anybody else taking material out of the project to make time. So let’s say we want the movie to be 100 minutes and it comes in at 130 minutes, at the editing stage and the directing stage, don’t remove any lines of dialogue to make it shorter. Make it as short as you can without removing material and then I’ll come in and decide.

GM: So they have those instructions.
BB: Yeah, I don’t want anybody pulling material. Outside of that, do whatever you can to make it as good as you can. I always love the editing process. And so much of it is built there. So much of the timing is built there. And if it’s not there on the day of the performance, that’s where you can tweak it and you can speed things up a little bit and find clever ways to remove information if a scene is dragging. So I don’t want people removing material but I’m happy with them offering suggestions. So they say, ‘I think this scene could possibly go.’ But I want to make that decision of what can and can’t go. So the editor does it, the director does it, then I do it. We all work with the editor because he runs the gear. He’s the guy working the machine.

GM: What are your titles? Star and executive producer?
BB: Generally speaking in the movie business, versus TV, you’re generally not an executive producer unless you’ve ponied up money. That’s the rule of thumb. And I didn’t pony up any money to do this. No actual cold, hard cash from me.

GM: So will it say anything else other than you as Leo?
BB: Yes. Producer. The producer in film is the person or people who get it done, make it happen; executive producers are kind of the money people.

GM: Through that whole post-production process, what did you learn that might have surprised you or was different from TV? How much different is being a movie star?
BB: The process is similar. The two TV shows, Corner Gas and Hiccups, that I did were single camera, so they were shot in a similar fashion. You gain information in a similar fashion. So the process is pretty similar. You can afford to take a bit more time with a movie. In our case, not a lot because we shot this thing in 20 days of filming. But the big difference for me was glaring. I couldn’t even wrap my head around it. It didn’t feel right to me. The big difference to me was, in a TV series I wear a lot of hats: I write, I act, I edit, and sometimes I direct. So there is no break in the course of your day. For me, when you're in production, it's 17 hours from the time I get up. I'm eating while I'm working. There's no break. So you finish a take and now we're going to turn the camera around and you've got eight minutes. I run to my desk and I start working on the script that I have to finish that's coming up. Or I'll run to my desk and edit one that we did last week. There's never a time that I shouldn't be doing something. There's one episode then another is coming and another is finished. It's just on a chain, right? So in the movie, I wear the hats, but it's a one-off. All my writing has been done. Now I'm in the process of acting. And I'm not going to be editing until months after we finish filming. So to come to grips with the notion that when we're on a camera turn-around, I just sit here and...

GM: Tweet.
BB: That's what I said: This is actually a Twitter break. This is what this is for. It took me three or four days.

GM: But you got used to that.
BB: I loved it. Having some time to kill, isn't that sweet?

GM: The movie's set in Vancouver. From TV and I guess standup, the general population knows you as a Saskatchewan guy. Is the movie your love letter to Vancouver?
BB: It is, in some ways. First of all because it's an awesome city. And so often it's not portrayed as itself. In fact, when the crew started asking what city it's supposed to be, and we said Vancouver, they said, 'Vancouver gets to be Vancouver?!' The crew was all excited about it because it doesn't happen that often. We don't hammer that home or anything. But you see the Vancouver skyline, you recognize it, you see the Lion's Gate Bridge.

GM: We might see that in other films but it's always supposed to be somewhere else.
BB: Yeah. It's just not hiding it as Vancouver, that's all. And there are little homages throughout. Like, you see a picture of a guy who's on his boat and the marina is the Urban Well. I had to come up with a name for a marina otherwise we'd have to get a licence from one of the existing marinas. I'd written it as False Creek Marina initially but then you gotta go through the process. And we didn't shoot in False Creek; we shot in another one. So it's easier to just make up a name. So Urban Well sounds like a good name.

GM: If you make more movies, this could be your Hitchcock thing: every movie would have an Urban Well in it.
BB: Yeah, exactly! That would be fun to do.

GM: Are your Saskatchewan peeps upset? I mean, I know you've been here 20 years.
BB: I don't think so. I mean, there are people in Saskatchewan who want me to just do everything all the time in Saskatchewan. But a) there's no tax credit systems and now there's no funding and lacking infrastructure because so many skilled people had to move where movies were being made. But other than that, Corner Gas took place in Saskatchewan, but that's why we shot it there – it was written to take place there. I don't have a desire to make every story in the same locale. Hiccups and No Clue were Vancouver-based because this is where my home is; it's very practical and handy. And it's beautiful. If you're working in a visual medium, it doesn't get any better than Vancouver. It's got everything you want. You see that a lot in No Clue, too. You see the beauty of Vancouver and then you see the gritty, back-alley, seedy... Because this is a film noir in a lot of ways. I mean, it's a film noir comedy and it's a contemporary movie. We're not trying to make an old movie, but those elements that make a film noir – less than pleasant people, dramatic lighting – those things are there.

GM: When does it open?
BB: March 6th in Vancouver and then March 7th in the rest of the country.

GM: What about the States?
BB: I don't know yet. We have a US distributor; we have an international distributor. The response at the Whistler Film Festival was strong enough that some things changed. We cut a 45-second teaser trailer to put in front of Anchor Man 2, so everywhere across Canada when you go see Anchor Man 2, you see a teaser trailer for No Clue, which is great because Koechner is in both. That was the thinking behind this. So the US distributor was up there and he came to me and said, "We should maybe talk about releasing this in northern States that get the TV bleed from Canada and who are familiar with your work on TV and maybe you could do some standup down in the northern States." He even thought maybe we should do something in March. But I don't know what's going to happen. That's up to them completely.

GM: Corner Gas was on the Super Station all over the States.
BB: Yeah, that's what I told him. And also a lot of people that have touched base with me from the States on Twitter are from southern States.

GM: Movies have changed. Now you've got Netflix and other means of getting it out there. Is the theatre still the preferred method?
BB: It's probably different for everybody, right? For me, I still love going to the theatre. It's an event. I don't think there's any better way to see it. If you have a great home theatre system, that could be pretty rocking. It's starting to compete with the theatre. But being in the theatre in the moment when the trailers start and all that stuff, to me that's still kind of exhilarating. And it's still different. It's still like I can't do this at home. I can do a smaller version of this at home but I can't do this at home. But for other people, they're like, "I don't like being in a room with other people. I don't like watching movies with a bunch of stupid people and somebody's got their phone out texting; their whole face is lit up." So there's people who prefer to watch it at home now. Shut-ins. Anti-social recluses. (laughs) But it's different for everybody. But the window of how long a movie's in the theatre before it's available on other platforms is shrinking all the time.

GM: That's why you've got to get them out on that first weekend?
BB: Yeah.

GM: Even in Canada?
BB: Yeah, absolutely. Because the exhibitors book stuff in but they don't contract with Anchor Man 2 that they promise to have it in the theatre for three weeks because if the people don't come out... It's short-term and you adjust your schedule accordingly.

GM: So the standup tour you're doing, it'll get Brent Butt in people's minds. They'll OD on Brent Butt.
BB: Well, here's hoping they don't OD. The notion always was from the git-go, when I was pitching the idea of doing a movie, the fact that I'm also a live performer as a standup comic, I could go on tour to support the movie the way a band goes on tour to support an album. And that was something everybody could understand and wrap their head around. It's something you can't always do. A lot of your best actors in the world don't have any live performance experience. It's gotta be in a big theatre or something with a play. But to just go on the road by themselves with a microphone and a snappy tie and perform for an hour... So everybody got that. Everybody saw how that could potentially be something. So from the get-go, that was part of the machine.

GM: And it helps that you like doing it.
BB: Yeah. I don't necessarily like doing 20 different cities in a month. I haven't done that in a long time. That's a haul. I haven't done that since pre-Corner Gas days.

GM: Also, who booked this? Ontario, BC, Ontario, Nova Scotia, BC. Nova Scotia to BC in two days. Alberta-Manitoba-Alberta.
BB: Surely you've been around long enough to understand that the venues aren't sitting by the phone hoping Brent Butt calls. You say here's when I gotta do these shows, here's my window performing, what venues are available? So it doesn't make it easy. But there's always people, like yourself, who say, "But Edmonton's closer to Calgary than it is to Halifax, ya idiot." And you go, "Hey, I never thought of that! Geez!" So yeah, there's a ton of things that go into the logistics and the planning. And that's what the promoter does. That's their gig. They put it all together. They find venues in markets.

GM: Theatres all the way. I've seen you at the Vogue.
BB: Not for a long time. I was the very first live performer at the Vogue when it stopped being a movie house and became a live venue again. I opened for Kids in the Hall. So they were the first live act booked there. I was their opening act. It was 1993. I hadn't been in Vancouver very long. I'd just moved here. I used to do studio warm-up for them in Toronto when they taped when I lived there. So they were doing this tour and they were starting out west doing Victoria and Vancouver so they called me and said, "Hey, you're in Vancouver now, right? Would you open for us at the Vogue Theatre?"

GM: I moved to Vancouver in '93 and I saw that show. Who knew?
BB: I got a very nice write-up.

GM: It wasn't me.
BB: No. It was Dave Watson.

GM: Oh right. He passed away a few years ago.
BB: Geez, I didn't even know that! Good God.

GM: You've really rededicated yourself to standup. Is that accurate?
BB: I don't feel like there's been any time away from it for me.

GM: In a quantitative sense.
BB: I'm not a guy in the clubs every night like I used to be.

GM: But you're more so now than you were the last six or seven years.
BB: Yeah, because I'm here more now. And I don't have constant other duties. I'm going to be spending a lot of this month trying to pop up places, work on material for the tour and do five minutes here and there.


"I've had this little mantra: The enemy of comedy is conspicuous effort. You shouldn't see any effort. You know, a lot of things have to be done right but that effort shouldn't be conspicuous." – Brent Butt


GM: When you started standup, it came so easily to you.
BB: Yeah, it felt like it came very naturally to me. I was able to get laughs early on.

GM: Coming back into it more now, is it as easy as it always was? Did it take a while to get your legs back?
BB: I don't get away from it that long that that much rust ever compiles. It's not like I'm hauling myself out of the basement after three years of having never done a show. It's never that. The longest it's ever gone in my life is maybe two months where I haven't done a standup show. There's a bit of ring rust in that time but it never takes long for it to bust off.

GM: Like within in the course of a performance?
BB: Yeah, usually. That's why it's nice to pop up and work on your material itself but also just being up in front of people with a mic in your hand, that's the gym, right?

GM: Sure. I've interviewed comics who say it's hard getting back after two weeks off. So when you started out, bam, you were in it all the time. Now you might do a show, take a couple months off.
BB: It was my whole life. It really was. From the time I decided to do standup when I was 12, I became fascinated with it.

GM: When you were what? Twelve?
BB: Twelve. Twelve is when I told mom I'm going to be a standup comedian. From that point on, I didn't have a lot of outlets but I searched for it whenever I could and watch it whenever I could. I started thinking about what my material would be. Even when I was out with buddies, I would be in my head formulating bits. If I said something funny that got a laugh, I would replay it in my head and be like, How could I get to that joke sooner? That was a long set-up. If I was going to perform what I just did with my buddies here, we can't have that big two-minute lead-up that got me to that joke. So how could I get to that joke quicker? I was workshopping in my head. I remember having this thought to myself when I was 18: This is all just killing time till I can do standup. I had other jobs and was doing other things but it was all like, This is all just shit that I have to do because I can't just lay down and wait for a comedy club to open up. I have to do other things. But this is all just killing time till I can start doing standup.

GM: So as you're formulating that in your head of how to get to the joke quicker, would you then go and try to bring the conversation around to a topic with other friends and get that joke in? Try it out?
BB: Yeah. I had a couple friends who knew that this is what I wanted to do so sometimes I would say to them, "Listen to this. What if I do this?" And they would listen and sometimes they'd laugh, sometimes they wouldn't. I'm sure for a lot of them there was kind of a notion that it's kind of a pipe dream you're chasing. It's like saying I'm going to be a rock star. Well, terrific. There's always that notion of, well who doesn't want to be a rock star? So for me, in this little rural community, to have this kind of... I think it was short of being an obsession but it was close to it. I mean, I thought about it all the time. I thought about standup, I told people. And I did it in high school at variety night, drama night.

GM: Did you do your own material?
BB: Yeah. For me, that just wouldn't have been any fun. Maybe it's why I write and create the TV and movie. Part of it is I'm more apt to hire myself than somebody else is. So it's partly out of necessity but for me I love to perform and I never want to get to a place where I'm not performing. But I get a big thrill out of seeing my idea come to fruition. I wrote a play in high school one time, too, that I wasn't in. I was in another play on variety night but I'd written this other one that other people put on. I remember going out that first night around to the back of the high school gym to watch it and it was such a thrill hearing someone doing the words that I came up with and hearing laughs. It was a thrill for me. But standup is those two things combines. It's the thrill of what you get from performing and the thrill of transferring your idea into the head of somebody else. It's a big thrill to me.

GM: Like giving somebody a tag, too.
BB: Yeah. So as far as standup goes, I've never had any interest in doing something that wasn't mine. I've had comics come up and give me a tag that's funny within the context of a bit that you've written. Proudlove or Beuhler or somebody will say, 'Hey, you know you can say such and such.' Give you an extra line. Fantastic. But I love that whole part of the creative community.

GM: Are you going to sneak into the back of the theatre when your movie's playing?
BB: Having gone through it in Whistler once – and I'm going to go see it here with people –

GM: And was it a little nerve-wracking? Because you didn't know how they'd react.
BB: Yeah, it was very nerve-wracking. The director, Carl Bessai, did an amazing job with this movie. I learned a lot watching this guy, who is a film maker, make this film. We were waiting in the wings. We were going to go out and speak and welcome everybody down and that kind of thing before the movie. We snuck down and were looking as people were coming into the theatre to see how it's filling up and stuff like that. He took this picture of me standing by the wings with the light coming in. To him, as a film maker, it was like, "What a great shot." So he just pulled out his phone and took it. You can see I'm concerned. Or I'm like, "How is this gonna go?" But also the sun's coming into the thing. When I saw it, it tells me a lot. It also tells me I gotta eat less and walk more. It's like a silhouette of Hitchcock. It's a horrible, physical condition. But you don't know how it's going to go. And you can't change anything. With standup, I can start doing a bit and it's not working, I can start changing something or I can go back even afterwards and go, okay, why didn't that work? Maybe I need to put this here. I can't fiddle around. The print is done. There's no changing anything now. If they hate it, it's just a thing that they hate out there in the world. There's no taking it back.

GM: Now you gotta think about – or maybe you don't – the goddamn critics.
BB: Yeah. Well, what are you gonna do, right? For me, you want the critics to like your stuff and you want them to say nice things and at the end of the day it strokes your ego and it also helps the business of making projects. So you want very much for the critics to like your stuff and say nice things about it. And it sounds kinda cliché-ish, but it's one of those things there's nothing you can do about it so there's not much sense worrying about it. The only thing you can do is really like what you've done. Then everything else is come what may. If what you wanted to make gets made, then come what may. That is what happened with No Clue. No Clue is better than I envisioned it. A big part of that is how Carl was able to do the things he did on not a huge budget. We had a good budget but it wasn't huge. And we were shooting in a small amount of time. And he was shooting with two cameras. I was calling him the Visual Aggregator. He has an ability to vacuum up all this amazing visual elements. When I watched the first set of dailies, that's when I was really impressed. I was like, I hope this doesn't look terrible. And because of the way Carl shoots, with the two cameras and it's real run-and-gun – he knows what he's doing – it's different from one camera in a controlled environment that you're very familiar with and you know the process: do this, do this, do this. And that's not what Carl was doing.

So for me, as the guy who was ultimately in charge of the final product, I've always been able to, no matter who was directing the thing, I knew what they were getting. So I could be on set in the scene and based on where the cameras were and what they were doing, I knew what they were getting. So in my head, I know what the options are going to be for editing. I would say to the director at the time that there's a shot I'm going to need in the edit that I don't have. We need to get this one thing. I've always been able to make an inventory as we're doing it. I know what the shots are: There's the two-shot; there's a single; there's a moving shot. We need a static of that, too, in case I need to cut from that to that. I can do the inventory in my head. But with Carl, I didn't know what he was getting. He was doing it in a different way than I've ever seen before.

GM: Is the two cameras something that's done with other directors?
BB: Yeah. More and more.

GM: Is that to get coverage?
BB: Yeah, you can get twice as much stuff in that time. Now and then on Corner Gas or Hiccups we would shoot with two cameras, but it was very rare. And even then it was such a big deal to do it we would sit down and go over everything: "Okay, what are you getting with the two cameras?" Well, Carl just knows what he's getting. We had many meetings ahead of shooting starting where we talked about tone and what we needed to get and specific gags that I felt had to be done this way. But I learned early on that what directors bring to the project is. You want that. You don't want just some guy standing there pretending to be a director and doing everything you say. You want a director who's going to make it better than you could imagine and come up with great stuff. And that's what Carl was doing.

The first day I looked at the dailies, I don't know if I actually squealed in the trailer by myself but I was so fucking over the moon I couldn't believe it. I was like pumping my fist in the trailer by myself because it looked like, just the raw footage untreated, looked as good as anything I'd ever seen anywhere. And the close-up coverage on people and the way Carl and our cinematographer, Jan Kiesser, worked the cool compositions and the dramatic lighting without being stark cartoony dramatic lighting. Very real but very dramatic. It looked so much better than the shit I had in my head, which was all very kind of static-y and it was all about the gag in my head. That's why I always knew we needed a film maker to make this movie not just somebody who says he's a director. We needed somebody who knew everything about making a movie. And Carl's one of those guys who's worked as a DP, he built stuff from scratch, he does other people's things. He's kind of done it all.

GM: Except for comedy, right?
BB: He hasn't done a lot of comedy but the great thing with No Clue was don't come in and make this a comedy movie. Make this a dramatic movie. And then there's this one guy that flows through who says funny things. But aside from a couple specific gags that have to be done a certain way, like when there's reveals or something, other than that forget that this is funny and make this dramatic murder mystery.

GM: That's what I thought was great about Corner Gas. You hired real actors and the writing took care of the funny.
BB: If the audience buys into the reality of what you're doing, anything that's incongruous is just so much funnier. So by hiring actors on Corner Gas, actors are able to make these people seem like real people. And they sell the situation and you buy it. You know people like this and it seems like a real thing. I've had this little mantra: The enemy of comedy is conspicuous effort. You shouldn't see any effort. You know, a lot of things have to be done right but that effort shouldn't be conspicuous.

GM: That's certainly your standup right there.
BB: Yeah. I mean, I try to make it seem as effortless and off-the-cuff and un-thought out as possible.

GM: Although there are other styles of comedy, like you mentioned Anchor Man, where it's not rooted in any kind of reality, or at least played a lot more obviously comedically and broad and over-the-top.
BB: Yeah, there's all kinds. There's Carry On movies... That's why I'm always fascinated with Rowan Atkinson because his two biggest were TV projects, Black Adder and Mr. Bean. Black Adder is all verbal language play. It's just a framework to have people say brilliantly crafted verbal jokes. That's all it is. And Mr. Bean, nobody says anything. It's all visual and physical. I was just fascinated that Rowan Atkinson could do these two extremes so well. One is a silent movie and one is a radio play, essentially.

GM: And there's Not the Nine O'Clock News, too, which he was really good in.
BB: Yeah, he's done a lot of things. A very talented dude. And I liked Johnny English a lot. Did you see the first Johnny English movie.

GM: No.
BB: I liked it a lot. I thought it was very funny. I remember Nancy saying one time, she likes it when a comedy says this is a comedy. It's kind of ballsy to go for it, to not hedge your bets with a dramedy. There's something that when somebody just goes for it and says this is either funny or it's nothing. I respect that.

GM: What did Nancy think of No Clue? I know she didn't read it ahead of time.
BB: Yeah, she went into it knowing nothing other than her minute-long scene that she's in.

GM: There's a mystery element to it. Was she able to figure it out?
BB: She said she didn't.

GM: But it all worked in her mind?
BB: Yeah. She seemed genuinely impressed in how it all came together. I sat beside her at the screening, which I thought about not doing but at the end of the day, what the hell.

GM: The optics wouldn't have been good. People would talk.
BB: But hearing her bust out laughing at some of the gags, there's nothing more gratifying. Because she doesn't laugh easily. Like most people who are gifted comedically, she doesn't laugh out loud that much because you often see it coming or you just kind of appreciate it as a craftsperson. And a couple of the gags that I really liked on paper and I thought we did well, I remember thinking, "I hope Nancy laughs at this." And hearing her laugh at it...

GM: In the trailer, there are drawings. Is that throughout the movie or just in the trailer and credits.
BB: No, just in the opening title sequence. Those are really lifted from the opening and closing title sequence. E1 liked those elements and they were trying to put a real kind of film noir trailer together so they put those elements in.

GM: You didn't draw them, did you?
BB: No.

GM: What are the differences in the acting between TV and movies?
BB: There were just things I've never had to deal with before: real emotions, fear, terror, sexual attraction. My character's legitimately in over his head in a real serious situation.

GM: Did you get help with the acting part?
BB: Not really. Sometimes the director'll come and we'll have a talk here or there. But I know who my character is and I know what the situation is. I did what I did and if it wasn't working, then the director would come and say maybe try this or that. But it was more of a stretch than I've ever had to do before.

GM: You compared your acting to Bob Hope's.
BB: I said with Bob Hope it didn't matter if he was an astronaut or a cowboy, you're getting that guy. And to some degree, that's kinda how I have been. Even with No Clue. But the thing is, that guy is put into much more dire, real situations with a lot more at stake. It's real and dire. There's real consequences if my character can't navigate the situation. There's real death and his could be one of them. And he's not good at this; he's not James Bond. He doesn't know what the situation is all the time. He's got to try and figure this out as he's in over his head. There's no learning curve for him. It's like, you've never had a moment's difficulty in your life and your life is on the line: go! That's kind of how it happens for him.

GM: He's a novelty salesman?
BB: Specialty advertising salesman. Basically his office is on the same floor as a private detective's office and a woman walks in the wrong place. And he knows the private detective is away and he wants to help. It's like, "I don't know where my brother is. Can you help me?" Alright. And before he realizes he's out of his depth, he's in over his head. So for him there's never that kind of 'hang on, this might be more than I can bite off.' I like to write with a question in mind and then you bring everything back to that whenever you can. And the question for this movie is, If you were thrown in the middle of the ocean, how far could you swim? You don't know how far you can swim until you have to find out. Like, if you're at Kits pool doing laps, you get tired and you quit. But I bet you get tired and you quit sooner than you would if you were in the ocean.

The notion behind the movie is you don't know how far you can swim until you get thrown in the ocean. In other words, you don't know what your abilities are until you get put into a situation where you have to find out. And that's kind of what happens with Leo. He's never done this kind of thing before. He's had a very safe, content, quiet, low-middle class/upper-lower class life. Safe. And within a matter of a small amount of time, he's just in it and there's no kind of 'I don't want to do this.' It doesn't matter; you're in. So how would a real-life person who wasn't Jason Bourne, somebody with no training, no background [react]? And kind of what we learned from this movie is he's maybe better at this than he would have given himself credit for.

GM: And therefore us, too?
BB: The notion is you might be better than you think you are at something if you've never tried it. It's kind of like that notion of all these people who went over to fight in World War II. Just farm kids and a guy from college who's studying to be an accountant, and the next thing you know they're in the shit, right? And some of them end up being incredible. Audie Murphy didn't know he could fly a plane better than anybody else and navigate the skies and shoot down the enemy better. He didn't know he was the best pilot in the world. He was just going about his business.

GM: And you named him Leo so you could get a Leo nomination?
BB: (chuckles) I just kinda liked the name Leo. You know, there's always a reason. My birth sign is Leo. It's also short. And it's a name that you're going to be typing a lot.

GM: Back to your standup. You're doing this theatre tour and working out at some clubs here and there. Just as there's a difference between TV and the movies, do you have to play it differently in the theatres than in clubs?
BB: The big change is the performance of it. I find you gear everything down a but just because you're filling a bigger space so you gotta take your time with it a bit more. So it's just like you gear down. There's club speed and there's theatre speed. The speed you go at performing for a thousand people is slower than 160 people.

GM: And that's something you just figured out by doing it?
BB: Yeah. The first time I played a really big room, and the first couple of gags didn't work that well, I knew right away why it was. I'm a little guy on a big stage in a huge room. It doesn't make sense for me to just be rattling this stuff off. It's a different pace. It's not 40 percent of what your club speed is. You just gotta take a little bit off. Partly because it's just got to travel. It's got to get out to them. Their laugh has to come back to you. It's a bigger space so just the physics of it mean gear down, take 10 percent off your performance speed.

GM: All things being equal, do you have a preference of venue?
BB: All things being equal, I think there's no better situation to do standup than a 200-seat club. Low ceiling, everybody's kind of tight to each other and it's dark. Anywhere between 150 and 250 in a tight room with a low ceiling is the best possible scenario. But having said that, I also love playing a theatre because it's a wash of laughs. It comes in like a giant wave. As a performer and as a standup, what you're doing is like what Seinfeld said: It's referred to as a monologue but it's very much a dialogue. It's just not words you're getting from the crowd but they're responding and they're reacting. You say something and they do something. And how they respond, it's like a conversation. Like, if I start talking politics and you drift off, if I have any sense of social capability, I'll be like, "Oh, he's not into politics." And we'll talk about something else. Or if I ask you how things are going in your marriage and you clam up, maybe we shouldn't talk about his marriage. So you get that with a crowd. So that's part of the fun of it, too.

In a theatre versus a club, that's when you can really start, because it's 10 percent or so sped down and it's coming in waves and everything's taking a bit more time and it becomes a bigger thing, you can really start playing with that time and start surfing it in a way. It kind of goes from boxing to surfing. Not that I've done either. I mean, I've been in a fistfight and almost drown by waves so I know when those things aren't going well!

GM: Who's opening for you?
BB: Different people in different regions. Ivan Decker's going to be opening my BC shows. Jamie Hutchinson will be opening the prairies, except Erica Sigurdson's coming to Regina. She'll play the casino shows with me. Graham Chittendon in Ontario and Nova Scotia.

GM: Did you get any good footage of your talk show you did in Victoria?
BB: Some great footage, yeah. We've actually hired a guy to piece it together. I'm going to be looking at it probably this week. It was kind of like take these five days and all this footage and build kind of a sizzle reel, basically. I'm not looking for five different shows, just great moments. It's one of the reasons I wore the same thing every night, so we could take great moments and make it look like one big show.

GM: A sizzle reel is kind of like a trailer to give to somebody who might want to produce it?
BB: Yeah. Make this look as exciting and appealing as possible. Partly for other people, partly for me, too. Make me want to watch this show, make me want to do this show.

GM: But it's not for public consumption.
BB: No. Probably not from those Victoria shows. Those were really for us to get this and see what it's like. You've known me long enough to know that I've always loved the idea of doing it.

GM: And Canada needs one.
BB: Yeah, we're ripe for it. There's no kind of late night entertainment show that's helmed by a funny guy. There's room for it, I think. But it's a helluva thing to do, especially if you're going to do it nightly, if it's not a once-a-week thing.

GM: Why?
BB: Because you're doing an hour every day.

GM: But everybody does talk shows. In the States.
BB: No, not everybody does.

GM: It's doable.
BB: Oh, it's doable for sure. But here's my point: It's such a workload. Like, you don't see Letterman making movies. You don't see Jimmy Kimmel making movies. You don't see them doing other TV shows. They produce things but they have very little to do with it. They own the rights to it and make money from it. But if you're somebody like me who likes creating and doing, as much as I love the idea of doing a talk show – and I really, really do; for a long time it was the thing I wanted to do more than anything else. That was the end goal was to do a talk show.

But that was all pre-Corner Gas, pre-Hiccups, pre-No Clue. I love the process of doing all this stuff. So I don't want to get into a situation where I can't do this other stuff but I've been kicking around with some people who really know the logistics of production – because I don't; I know the tip of the iceberg when it comes to production logistics – so I'm talking with Laura, who works for my company, who knows everything there is to know about the logistics of putting a show together. Are there ways that we could do a talk show that would allow me to do other things. And it is potentially doable. It's a haul, though.

GM: I would imagine in Canada you wouldn't need to go year round. You could take three months off in the summer and put on repeats and you could do a movie or something like that.
BB: You would have to create a situation like that. But then you also have to seriously consider how much of you people want. You have to have a realistic sense of the appetite that people have for you. Do people want to see me every night on the show and then go see me do a movie, or is it going to be, "Jesus, shut up with this guy. Every time you turn around." I mean, if people started getting sick of Will Ferrell during the promos of Anchor Man 2, because he was everywhere doing everything. Like, I never thought I would ever hear anybody say, "Geez, I'm getting enough of this guy." And I heard it for Anchor Man 2.

GM: Oh did you? Good, because that's how I felt.
BB: Yeah. There's people who are big fans of his and think he's a genius: "Jesus, every time I turn around..."

GM: The way talk shows are now, it's more of a comedy show with the host as the star. When I was growing up, it was more of a talk show and you watched for the conversation. So there's that model to consider, how much to thrust yourself into it if you want to be doing other projects as well. But you should do it.
BB: I wouldn't mind taking a run at doing it. I still like the idea. I'm just more aware of the obligation now than I was before, having been in production for 15 years.

GM: And with Bullard, it seemed like nobody liked it, although I liked it. When you're on all the time, it's like anything, people are going to eventually start noticing what they don't like and start chipping away at it. I stumbled across it before I ever even heard about it. I'd never seen him before and I saw this ugly guy doing comedy in his monologue and thought, "Who's this? Canada has a talk show?" And I was sucked in. And then I excused the parts I didn't like because I came from a framework of liking it rather than immediately hating it.
BB: When you're out there that much all the time, any time you put yourself out there, you're volunteering to be critiqued. So if you're putting yourself out there all the time and every day, it's a lot of opportunity to say, "Hey, did you like this? What did you think of this?" It's a lot of that. And you're gonna screw up sometimes. You're going to do things that don't work that well. If you're asking people to find stuff about your show that they don't like, there's a lot of opportunity there. One of the things that makes it so amazing when people can do it consistently so well, like Letterman did and like Carson did and I think what like Jimmy Kimmel is doing now. It's very human and very real and there's a palpable sense of it could not work at any given time, and sometimes stuff doesn't work but the magic is making it work 90 percent of the time and those 10 percent failures will be charming in some capacity. That takes a special type of person.

GM: Those guys weren't needy, that may be it.
BB: Maybe. They're not begging for your approval all the time. They're like, "We're gonna do the best we can. We're gonna do this show but at the end of the day...". Yeah, I think that's a good point.

GM: I saw Wilmott in Victoria.
BB: Mike Wilmott.

GM: As he shuffled past me, I thought how is it possible that I'm older than that guy?
BB: (chuckles) There are times when he gives off an elder countenance, doesn't he? He lives large. He lives hard. He goes at it, man. Smoking, drinking, talking loud and eating bad food. He goes for it. And you can't not love the guy. From the time he was 20 he was kind of like your gruff drunken uncle. He's always had that kind of 'grab you and give you a noogy' kind of a big lovable, gruff... And it's so authentic with him, that's why it's worked for so long for him. As strong an act as he was at 25, at 45 he was stronger.

GM: He's grown into that guy. Was it harder to watch as a 20-year-old?
BB: No, it was never hard to watch. It always worked. Because it's authentic. It just keeps getting more and more authentic. The older he gets, the more authentic it becomes. I think when he's 65, he'll probably be right about at his peak, his zenith.

GM: Anything else we need to talk about?
BB: I don't know. Whatever we can do to get people down to the Vogue. It's a big room.

GM: How many does it hold?
BB: If you fill the balcony, I think it's over a thousand. The best live venues are ones that can be half full when you take the balcony away but it feels like a packed theatre. I think it's 700 on the main floor. Don't quote me on that. So it's a matter of getting a few hundred people out and having a good time. It's always the concern especially in big markets. There are options. And Patton Oswalt's going to be here [around that time]. So you start competing for comedy dollars, for that specific niche; not people who want music or people who want to see a play – people who want to see standup. Now you start fragmenting those people. And in some ways, if I'm Joe Guy you can see, or that you have seen... I mean, I was doing shows every Tuesday night, two shows, in town for six or seven years before going off to do Corner Gas.

So I was a guy you could come down and see for five bucks. You could watch him get drunk. What I'm hoping is that there's a translation from people who were in their 20s coming down to that show at the Urban Well are now in their 30s, have more disposable income and go, "We used to see that guy all the time down at the Well. Let's see the big theatre show." It's very different. You know what it was like in the old days. I would go up for two minutes in between acts. I'd be at least half in the bag. 

GM: You've developed a lot of new material since then.
BB: Yeah. And I'm going to be out there for an hour, hour-and-fifteen. It's usually about an hour-and-fifteen that I do.

GM: Are you still taking questions from the audience?
BB: Sometimes. I think I will on this tour because it opens itself up to allow me to talk about the movie. But also it's always a lot of fun, that kind of Carol Burnett-y turn-the-houselights-up.

GM: At the Well, you weren't taking questions but there were lots of interactions.
BB: I was shooting the breeze with people, yeah. In that situation, where I'm doing two shows in front of the same crowd – so many of the people would be regulars – that there's no possible way you could churn out enough material for every show. So you have to rely on your ability to play around off the cuff and it's something that I've always been fairly adept at.

GM: And some aren't.
BB: Some are, some aren't. 

GM: It's found material.
BB: Yeah. You're crafting on the fly.

GM: But there you were asking the questions; here you're getting asked the question.
BB: But it works well. I've always enjoyed doing it, as long as the questions come. Sometimes you say, "Okay, let's open up. Are there any questions?" and no questions. Then it's kind of weird. Okay, well let's shut the lights back down and I'll try and slide back into standup. That won't be too clunky! It's all very informal.

GM: You won't have a chance to relax before the movie opens.
BB: No, the tour ends March 4 and the movie opens here March 6. So what we're doing, all along this tour, anybody who comes to the live show venue, we're gonna do a draw. We're gonna fly two people from wherever to Vancouver for the red carpet screening.

GM: What if they're from here?
BB: One of the things I was thinking is maybe we can turn this into a positive, maybe we could open it up to the people of Vancouver and say in lieu of a flight to Vancouver, because you live here, what else could we do? I could come to your house and make you dinner. Or we could all go to the Keg. (laughs) Whatever the hell. Something else. We want to maybe get creative with it.

GM: So people from Vancouver are still eligible.
BB: Yes. It's still going to the red carpet premier and walk the red carpet and go to the party and all that kind of stuff. You will be invited.

GM: How do they enter?
BB: At the venue. When you're there, you enter your name. The way we're probably do it – and this still needs to be ironed out – that night we'll pick five from Edmonton, five from Lethbridge, five from Winnipeg. They go into one drum. We will let everybody know on that night. So if you're there at the Vancouver show or if you're there in Winnipeg or whatever, and we pull your name, you know if you're one of the people that's going in the final draw and be ready to get on a plane March 5th to come to Vancouver.

GM: So at your show, you will draw the five names.
BB: I believe I will be drawing the five names. 

GM: So they know it's on the up-and-up.
BB: Yeah. It's happening right here and right now.

GM: This reminds me of when you told me about Corner Gas. It took years and then, there's that thing he was talking about. Then you were making the movie and there was a long wait for it to be released and now here it is.
BB: Now here it is, two months away and it'll be in theatres. It's exciting times. And hopefully it goes well enough they'll let me do another movie.

GM: Who's they?
BB: The people who decide who gets the money to make movies. You always gotta get money from sources.

GM: Don't you get three movies?
BB: I hope so. I like that idea.

GM: It says 'All Ages' for the tickets to your live show. I remember on my show you said one day you want to do a dirty show.
BB: Yeah, I don't know who decides that. That's never something that I put out there.

GM: They don't clear that with you?
BB: No, they just think he generally works clean. Somehow it comes down to that. And you want to sell as many tickets as you can. I said on Twitter the other day, somebody asked me about bringing their 7-year-old to my show. They basically said, "Should I bring my 7-year-old to your show or are you filthy?" There's a whole lot of reasons to not bring your 7-year-old to a show without filth. I tried to respond saying it's not about working blue, it's is your 7-year-old going to like politics or science or paying taxes? Is this going to entertain? They'll ask you if it's appropriate. I said I'm not Gwar but I'm not the Doodlebops.

Plus, I don't know your kid. Is your kid a moron? Is your kid super-smart? When you say 'family friendly', if you are an evangelical minister... I've had people come up to me upset because I said the word 'hell' and 'damn' in my act. Like, steamed! I got accused of blaspheming one time. I was like, blaspheming? What year is this that you expect to not hear somebody blaspheme? Where can I not hear any blaspheming? A live standup show! So I just never know what to tell people. I say I don't know. Are you going to be offended by what I do? I don't know. Maybe. I can't worry too much about it. What I think is safe is completely outrageous to somebody else and something that I'm on the fence about, I think Oh my God, is this maybe really on the borderline of filth, there's other people who think it's pablum. So I don't know. Answer your own goddamn questions! Take a leap.

I tried to say this to somebody else the other time: I said I doubt there's anything in my show that's going to scar your kid for life. It might make your kid ask you a couple questions. It's like that Louis C.K. bit about gay marriage. People are like, "What am I supposed to say to my kids?" We're not gonna pass laws because you don't want to talk to your fucking kid for two minutes. Sit down and talk to your goddamn kid for two minutes. "I don't know what to say to him." Scream it out. Tell him two people fell in love. Figure it out!

GM: You're the parent!

BB: Yeah, that's your job. Don't feel upset because something happened and now you gotta talk to your kid for two minutes. Your stupid fucking kid.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Podcast episode 337ish: Peter Carlone & Chris Wilson

Peter Carlone and Chris Wilson have been making sweet comedy together since graduating from theatre school together. Pete gave himself top billing in the name Peter'N'Chris but Chris has responded by moving to Toronto. But they're together on this episode. They're also our first guests of 2014 and it was my first time meeting them. They tell us about their failed auditions for theatre school, how they create sketches together across 3000 miles and Skype, and they brainstorm a documentary tentatively called Pete'N'Chris and the Search for MacGuffin. There was also talk of VaSkeFe, aka Vancouver Sketch Comedy Festival, which has since ended. But the troupes we talked about are still going at it somewhere so it's still relevant.

Have a listen below or download it at iTunes, Stitcher, PodcastLand, or wherever you can find it.




Sunday, February 9, 2014

Feb. 9: Mike Storck

It's Family Day weekend so we're bringing in a guest who's like family. It's Mike Storck's third visit to the program. The Baltimore comic always makes it a point to drop by when he's in town. He was here in 2011 and 2012. Since he missed 2013, we've got some catching up to do with the 15-year comedy vet. For instance, does he now reside in New York or is he still in Baltimore? I have no idea! Exciting, isn't it? We'll all find out together tonight from 11pm to midnight on CFRO, 100.5 FM in Vancouver. Or for Mike's friends and family south of the border, you can livestream the show at coopradio.org or just wait for the podcast to be released. (I know, I know, we're slow on that front. I hope to get the Peter 'n' Chris episode up this week some time. Patience.)

Monday, January 27, 2014

Podcast episode 336ish: Harry Doupe

This was a long time coming. Sorry about that. But it's sweeter with the wait, isn't it? I had one email from a listener asking when we'd get the episode up. And I spoke to one comic who couldn't wait for the podcast so he cheated by going to the radio station archives. Unfortunately, that only records the first hour and this puppy went about 90 minutes. So here it is in all its glory.

Harry Doupe was our last live guest of 2013. He recently moved back to BC after 20 years living in Toronto. He spoke of his hoarding, told us what it's like working as a writer on the Junos, the Geminis and for the Olympics, we tested his encyclopedic knowledge of sports and music, and he tells tales of Paula Poundstone, Mike Bullard, Robbie Robertson, Burton Cummings, Stan Mikita, Norm Macdonald, and David Foster.

In case you've forgotten how to do this, you can listen right here and right now by clicking below, or you can head on over to Stitcher or iTunes or Podcastland. The podcast world is your oyster. We're good to go at all those places.



Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Stewart Francis interview

One of my favourite comedians is in town this week. Stewart Francis hasn't been here since 2008. He hasn't been anywhere in Canada, in fact, other than on vacation. Certainly not in a club. But he's tearing it up in the UK, where he's lived since 2006. He plays Yuk Yuk's on Cambie tomorrow (Jan. 23) through Saturday (Jan. 25). He's not playing anywhere else in the country on this trip, either. By the sounds of it, I'm not certain he ever will. So I'd highly recommend checking him out. Here's a phone interview I did with him two weeks ago.

Stewart Francis
January 9, 2014
"We don’t have a star system in Canada for the arts so all of us have to go further afield to find success. That’s disappointing but having said that I’m grateful for the way it’s turned out for me." – Stewart Francis

Stewart Francis: Hello?

Guy MacPherson: Stewart Francis! This is Guy MacPherson in Vancouver.
SF: Hi Guy MacPherson in Vancouver. How are you?

GM: I’m well. How are you?
SF: Good, thank you.

GM: What city are you in?
SF: Just outside of Edinburgh.

GM: Are you touring there or do you live there?
SF: We’ve got a little place up here. We live in London but we just come up here to see some family members and go to a rugby game on Saturday.

GM: Are you a big rugby fan?
SF: Uh, yes. It’s a good excuse to hang out with my uncle. And the local team’s doing good, too.

GM: I’m glad you’re coming back here. It’s been a few years. Are you performing elsewhere or just in Vancouver?
SF: Just in Vancouver. First club date in seven years in Canada.

GM: When did I write about you?
SF: It’d probably be 2006. That’s when I did my cross-country tour.

GM: You know when it was? It was the festival and it was 2008.
SF: 2008? Oh really. That was the festival. I wasn’t actually booked into a club for a weekend. This is the first in seven years because we left in 2006.

GM: Yeah, you had left already. You were playing Lafflines out in New West.
SF: Yeah. Anyway, this is the first time in ages. Let’s not fall out over this, Guy.

GM: The time in 2006 was when you, Garry [Yuill, the current franchise owner of Yuk Yuk’s Vancouver] and I went and had coffee together between shows.
SF: That’s right.

GM: And now look at him!
SF: He was so impressed by what he saw, he bought it.

GM: He’s like Viktor Kiam, the razor guy. But it’s funny how now he owns a Yuk Yuk’s.
SF: Yeah. He’s always been a funny fellow. I could see that in him when we played baseball together in Toronto. I didn’t know what he did for a living, quite honestly.

GM: Well, I’m excited you’re coming because you’re one of my favourites.
SF: Oh nice.

GM: You told me after I wrote that review on you last time that it was the first review in Canada you’d ever received.
SF: Yeah, if I said it, it was true. We’d get previews. That’d probably be the extent of it, that so-and-so is coming to town. If you’re lucky to get that because previews would kind of suggest that people had heard of the person. But that was the first genuine review.

GM: That is nuts. And you’d been a comic 20 years already. And was that the last review you got in Canada.
SF: In Canada, yeah. Over here it’s a different scene altogether.

GM: Oh, I know. That’s what I was getting at. You move to England and you’re written about all the time, you’re on TV all the time. It’s remarkable.
SF: Thank you. It’s kind of what I hoped would have happened in my home and native land but as you well know, we don’t have a star system in Canada for the arts so all of us have to go further afield to find success. That’s disappointing but having said that I’m grateful for the way it’s turned out for me.

GM: Canadians want that acceptance that some other group likes them first. Have you found that here or do they still ignore you?
SF: Not ignore me. The word I use is adorable, without sounding too arrogant. I recently went back to Toronto and I was in the lift, or elevator, and the guy I was on the elevator with turned to me and said, ‘You a comedian?’ I said yeah. And he said, ‘I’m a huge fan of yours.’ And I said, ‘Oh, thanks!’ And he said, ‘What’s your name again?’ And that just really sums it up. We know what we like in Canada, obviously. I said, ‘Thanks, I appreciate it.’ I wasn’t offended; I found it quite funny. But technically if you’re a huge fan of someone’s, you would know their name, I would have thought. But it just kind of summed Canada up for me in a way, if I needed any summation. We’re really good, we’re really a talented bunch, but to find that success, we have to travel.

GM: Glen Foster is ‘That Canadian Guy’ because people don’t know his name.
SF: I think Glen did that when he started coming over here to the UK. It doesn’t make that much sense when he’s back in Canada on a show with three or four other Canadians. But he probably had the t-shirts printed so he’s gotta go with ‘That Canadian Guy.’ But it made far more sense over here when you go to the comedy club and who did you like? ‘Oh, I liked that Canadian guy.’ As opposed to the Irish guy or the English woman. So it made sense.

GM: I know you often tour with Craig [Campbell] and Glenn [Wool]. They’re what I picture when I think of Canadian comics in England. You’re the outlier, the different one. They’re lumberjack-looking guys. But you’re the sophisticate.
SF: Exactly. When we did Edinburgh two years ago, I grew a beard. That was my contribution to looking like a lumberjack. I wore a plaid shirt. I tried. But they’re definitely more the rough-and-tumble looking, beautifully disheveled. Whereas I come with my hair all perfectly in place. I’m the tidy lumberjack. That was a long time coming because we did The Lumberjacks about 17 years ago in Edinburgh. Craig and I split the bill because we were relatively new over here and had no profile whatsoever so we thought if we split an Edinburgh show doing a half-hour each that would be good. I don’t know if we knew if we had half an hour to do. And then a couple weeks into that, Glenn joined us. So it’s come full circle in that we did the tour last year.

GM: I know Phil Nichol is there, too. How many Canadians are on the scene there?
SF: I don’t know. They come and go. So I’m not quite hip to the scene, as it were. But yeah, Phil and Tom Staid and Sean Collins and Alyson Smith. I would say upwards of ten. Tony Law, although he never did standup in Canada. He started over here because he was living over here. I don’t know if he’s been back since. But yeah, there’s about ten of us that are kind of mainstay Canadians over here. I’m the king of that list.

GM: That goes without saying!
SF: (laughs) It’s worked out nicely.

GM: You mentioned 17 years ago playing Edinburgh. So you’ve been over there throughout your career but only moved there permanently seven years ago.
SF: Yeah, I moved over full-time seven years ago and about five years ago, through some successful TV appearances, I was kind of launched into the psyche of the British comedy fan.

GM: How did those appearances come about?
SF: An agent asked me if I wanted to do a couple of panel shows. They were kind of back to back. There was one called Eight out of Ten Cats, which was okay. Then I did Mock the Week, which really speaks to my style of comedy because it’s a panel show so you’re doing all sorts of topical stuff. There was also a segment where you’ll see a topic come up and four performers and each will have one topic. Then you do a group of jokes on that topic. And being a one-liner guy, that kinda really resonated with the viewing audience. Subsequent to that I’ve done 17 or 18 of those shows. So I’m suddenly entrenched into the people’s brains where they now know me by name. The power of television, I’m telling you.

GM: Do you still do it?
SF: I’ve handed in my resignation a couple of times. The producer called up and talked me into doing it. I did it a couple months ago but you don’t want to overstay your welcome. There are other things I’ve got, television-wise, that I want to pursue. And there’s a lot of other guys and gals over here that just do way too much television. I’ve never wanted to be that performer where it’s, ‘Oh, not him again.’ It’s funny how I’m coming from Canada, where you’re craving recognition. I’m grateful for it and I do need it over here, but I turn down more television work than I accept over here because I pride myself in, whenever you see me on TV, it’s gonna be good. I hope that’s always been the case and I work to that being the case in the future.

GM: You mention that the one-liners work well for that style. I’ve seen you in different venues and they always work well. They’re great. But England has more of a storytelling tradition.
SF: No, there’s a lot of one-liner guys. Back in the day in the gentlemen’s clubs, the clubs were rife with one-liner guys. I see storytelling being more – although there’s great storytellers from this part of the world – as far as standup goes, more of an American thing. But there’s both over here now and I’m sure there always has been. When we look at the comedy legends, a lot of them are one-liner guys: Les Dawson and Tony Cooper. They blazed the trail for the likes of me. There aren’t that many one-liner guys now. There’s more now because of the success of myself and a couple other guys like Milton Jones and Tim Vine and Jimmy Carr. But fortunately there’s not that many doing it very well. There’s nothing worse than a bad one-liner. It’s kinda painful to watch. But it’s a big part of the culture over here, the one-liner.

GM: Maybe I’m confusing it with the Fringe shows in Edinburgh where they come up with a new theme and hour per year.
SF: Yeah, definitely. You’re right there. The Fringe really speaks to what you’re talking about, the storytellers talking about their travels to Cambodia and doing the whole hour on that. It’s very challenging because a lot of the guys and gals that are doing that, some will come up here seven years on the trot and coming up with a new hour every year. It sounds great but it might not be great. I don’t go to a lot of the shows up here. Probably for that reason because there’s gotta be, at some point, where you don’t have a great year.


"To reveal myself or to pontificate, it’s just too self-indulgent. I’m being self-indulgent enough going on stage and holding court. I don’t want to push my luck. I am interesting and I do have interesting views, as we all do, but I wouldn’t dare take up your time with that." – Stewart Francis

GM: In America, the personal style of comedy is really in fashion. Everybody has to reveal everything about themselves while you reveal absolutely nothing about yourself.
SF: Yeah. Long may that be the case. There’ll be bit that comes out but my contract with you, the audience member, is just to make you laugh for as long as I’m on stage, which is probably why I’m a one-liner guy – just get up there and tell as many jokes as I possibly can and get back off stage. To reveal myself or to pontificate, it’s just too self-indulgent. I’m being self-indulgent enough going on stage and holding court. I don’t want to push my luck. I am interesting and I do have interesting views, as we all do, but I wouldn’t dare take up your time with that.

GM: So that’s the reason. You’re not trying to hide from people.
SF: No! In an interview like this, I’ll probably say way more. Like, I’ll hang up the phone and ‘What the fuck did I say that for?’ So there’s no dark, deep mystery. But that’s one-on-one. Hopefully if I’m talking to somebody, I will want to open myself up. On stage, I don’t need that audience to know anything about me other than, hopefully, I’m hilarious. If they take that away from the evening, we’re both winners.

GM: Is it a conscious thing, too, where one joke you’re married, the next you’re single, the next you’re gay, or whatever it is?
SF: Yeah, exactly. I’m one of those three things! But you, as the audience member, don’t need to know that. It’s unlimited now. If I’m married in that joke, and gay in this joke, then I can go all over the show because there’s no rules when it comes to one-liner guys. Or storytellers, because they could be telling a complete made-up story. But the one-liner stuff is my favourite style of comedy. You get more bang for your buck. If you don’t like that one, there’s one right after it. I think if I delve deep, it probably came from my early days on stage. There’s nothing worse than no laughter from the audience. So if I’m talking, in the form of me telling a million one-liners, at least there’s noise in the room. And the better I am, the more that noise is filled with laughter. There should be two noises: either me talking or you laughing. I gave that thought recently. I thought that could be part of it. That’s not the main reason; it’s just I love that kind of comedy. Like watching The Naked Gun and Police Squad. We’ll watch that till the day we die and loving it because there’s gag after gag after gag. It’s just silly.

GM: After the first contradiction you give, audiences may sit up and go, ‘Oh, he made a mistake. He forgot his character.’ But when you do it more than once…
SF: Oh yeah. That’s ridiculous.

GM: Yeah.
SF: Take each joke at face value as opposed to, ‘Wait a minute!’

GM: So that was a conscious decision from the beginning or was it a mistake and you went ‘What the hell, these are all one-liners’?
SF: Steve Martin, before he started making the crap films, he was, as you well know, a brilliant standup comedian. And he was all over the show. There were no rules. It doesn’t have to make sense. That surreal aspect to comedy obviously registered deeply with me. I love it. I’m also a cartoonist. In cartoons there are no rules. It doesn’t need to make sense. The only thing it needs to be is funny. And hopefully more times than not they are.

GM: The Road Runner goes over the cliff and the next scene he’s fine.
SF: Exactly. As a kid, maybe you’re, ‘What? That doesn’t make sense.’ But it doesn’t need to make sense.

GM: I know you’re a cartoonist, but what does that mean?
SF: It means most recently that my cartoons came to life in the form of my book I just had released in November. It’s a collection of my jokes, and over 30 of my cartoons. It was Plan A.

GM: Was it?
SF: Oh, absolutely.

GM: Is it available here?
SF: It’s available on Amazon so you can order it. My DVD is also available there however they’re not formatted for North American consumption which is disappointing. But the book you can actually buy and it’s called Pun Direction. We had to call it something. But yeah, I’m cashing in on my second favourite band.

GM: Your first being?
SF: Megadeth.

GM: Of course. I spoke to Brent Butt yesterday and he was also a cartoonist.
SF: Oh my goodness. I’m such a huge fan of his. And Glenn, when we were on tour were talking about it and I said I’ve never met him. He couldn’t believe that.

GM: Get out of here.
SF: No, I’ve never met him.

GM: I was in a coffee shop with him yesterday.
SF: Well, lucky you. All of us should be able to have that privilege. He’s absolutely one of my favourite comedians.

GM: He lives here, you know?
SF: Yeah. And he’s over the moon with his Roughriders winning the Grey Cup, I can only imagine.

GM: His movie’s coming out in March.
SF: Oh, wow, I didn’t know he did a movie. I’m a huge fan of his. If you do see him again, tell him I’m a huge fan of his as is my lovely Scottish wife.

GM: I’ll tell him to go to your show.
SF: Yes! (laughs) Never meet your heroes.

GM: In the book we don’t get to know you either, right?
SF: No, of course not. No.

GM: Good Lord, why would we want to?
SF: No! Again, I’m not Johnny Carson weird; I’m private. It’s not that kind of book. And it would never be. I would never write an autobiography. It’s just too self-indulgent.

GM: I’ll write an unauthorized biography of you, how’s that?
SF: Yes, now you’re talking! That I would read.

GM: You made a real seamless transition over there, obviously. I know your parents were British and you spent a lot of time there, so that’s probably why. I heard one joke of yours that you adapted. You changed ‘trunk’ to ‘boot’.
SF: Exactly.

GM: And I went, ‘He’s sold out!’
SF: You have to. There are certain words, obviously, you don’t change. And the more successful I’ve become, the less I do do that. But back in the day I had to make it a ‘boot’ so they fully understood what I was talking aboot. Now I understand the world’s gotten smaller through social media and television and films; everybody kind of knows elevator’s a lift and that kind of stuff. I’ve adapted the other way around: Here I refer to it as ice hockey. They got me. I just can’t win.

GM: British comics come over here and don’t change a single word or phrase. We just have to figure it out through the context, but they don’t adapt.
SF: As you’re saying that, one of my favourite stories came to mind. Bobby Keele, Jr. was coming over here back in the day and was trying to make some inroads into the UK. He was asking someone backstage at the Comedy Store or somewhere if they have Freedom 55 commercials. And they don’t. His big parting piece was a Freedom 55 commercial parody or something of that ilk. And he did it anyway even though ‘we don’t know what Freedom 55 means’. He was dismissive, saying, ‘They’ve got retirement plans. They’ll know what I’m talking about.’ And he went out there and they didn’t know what he was talking about. So you’ve got to make some adjustments. I probably did ‘trunk’ in the early days when I did that joke and maybe it wasn’t getting the response it deserved. So someone might have said, ‘You might want to change that to boot.’ It’s funny. Canadians saying ‘boot’? We can’t say it enough.

GM: I’ll let that go then.
SF: (laughs) Listen to you! Not that I’m trying to get back in your good books, but it doesn’t happen very often. ‘Boot’ and ‘lift’ are the only two things that come immediately to mind but the rest stays. No one changes me!

GM: You’re not coming here just for the shows, are you? Are you vacationing?
SF: Originally it was going to be I was going to pop down to L.A. and do the Conan O’Brien show, but I opted out of doing that. I’ve got an open invitation, as I understand it – look at me! But I was coming over to you guys because I was going to do Conan, I was going to do a whole bunch of Leaf games. But I thought I’ll just do the club for Garry because he’s asked me a couple times and there’s not a lot of pressure involved in that and the Leaf games are just joyous. Hopefully. I didn’t want to put pressure on myself for the trip. I wanted it to be more or less nothing but pleasure. So I will do Conan or another late night show down the road.

GM: Have you been on Conan before?
SF: Nope. No, I have not. I would have loved to have done The Tonight Show because that was the first late night show that I fell in love with, with Johnny Carson. So that would have been rather wonderful. Maybe after my next tour I might do something and just really just do – as I would anyway – a killer set of more or less three tours’ best of material in a 5-minute set and just blow the doors off the place and just see what happens. I don’t look to conquer America. It’s no longer on my list of things to do, which just takes all the pressure off me to go over there and just do an incredible job. Although I already did that with the Craig Ferguson show so I don’t know why I’m doing it again. You talked me out of it.

GM: Just remember to change ‘boot’ back to ‘trunk’ again.
SF: I will do.

GM: Is this for real?: You’re doing standup on Mt. Everest?
SF: Yes. To the best of my knowledge. I’ve met with some people and they put it on the internet so it must be true. Like everything, I’ll believe it when I see it. But there will be medicals and some prep work leading up to it but it’s full steam ahead as far as I’m concerned.

GM: How high up are you going?
SF: Base camp. Which is five-and-a-half thousand… What would it be? I don’t know if it’s feet or metric. I don’t know what it is. [note: it’s metres] It’s base camp. It’s an auction for 50 people. They’re trying to raise money for Save the Children. It’s huge to be involved with such a noble charity. People will bid against each other to get the 50 allocated seats. It should be incredible.

GM: You’re going to hike up there? And there’ll be a stage?
SF: Yeah. A stage and we’ll have sherpas. Yeah, it should be incredible.

GM: I hope the mics don’t cause an avalanche.
SF: That would be something, yeah.

GM: Are you much of a hiker or outdoorsman?
SF: I did Machu Picchu about six years ago with my wife. We did the 4-day Andes Trek to see Machu Picchu. I do a lot of walking. Still working out in the gym and playing ice hock— Ice hockey! I play hockey whenever I get the chance. But this could be the highest I’ve ever gone. It’s gotta be. I think it’s higher than Machu Picchu.

GM: And it’ll be filmed, right? For a documentary?
SF: I think there’s a documentary involved. It’s a charity organizer I’ve been working with for a number of years over here and he approached me two years ago. ‘Yeah, yeah, sure, sounds good.’ And it did sound good but you hear a lot of things and you don’t want to put too great an importance on it happening because it might not happen so why set yourself up for disappointment. But it seems we’re closing in on it.

GM: What’s this nonsense I hear about your retiring?
SF: I say that from time to time. That was taken out of context. I didn’t know I was going to do a second tour. During the first tour in interviews I said this will probably be it. I truly thought that. More to the fact it was 18 years of accumulated material. I thought I’d have to wait another 18 years to do another tour. But I put pen to paper and 18 months later I came up with my second tour. So after that I thought, well, that was a really good one. It was well received. You don’t want to push your luck. And I started putting pen to paper again so I think I’ll do another tour. So each time I say it, I’m not saying it in a dramatic way. But at one point I will mean it.

GM: So it will be true eventually.
SF: It will be true. Unless I’m happy with the tour, and how the writing’s come along, that will be it and I’ve absolutely no qualms about that whatsoever. But there will be another tour in 2015 and then that probably will be it! But that’s how I put these things out there. Without being dramatic but it’s always taken as ‘oh he’s going to quit after that.’ I don’t remember saying it quite as dramatically as that. But it is what it is.

GM: Maybe the tour will be over here.
SF: I don’t know about that. That would be disappointing. Just because my profile is non-existent in comparison to over here. I’m a semi-celebrity hanging out with rock stars and royalty. To go back to Canada would be a disheartening step back just doing clubs.

GM: No, I meant a theatre tour here.
SF: I can’t put bums in seats in the comedy clubs based on my profile, and largely based on promotion of me by said clubs. They gotta go hand in hand and give me something to work with. But I just don’t see Canada as being a country that can support that kind of… You know, Brent can do it and Derek Edwards can do it. They’ve stayed there, obviously. Me leaving seven years ago won’t help my profile much.

GM: Danny Bhoy comes here every single year. And Tommy Tiernan comes here frequently, too. I always wonder if there are enough people here who even know who they are, but they keep coming back.
SF: Ah, well maybe I will. I can’t get back to Canada quick enough. It’s just weird that I go back there on holiday. But I’m very connected to Canada because through technology I get to watch my Leafs. I’ve watched every game of theirs the last two years. Yeah, feel my pain.

GM: I watch every Raptor game. Does that count?
SF: I’m starting to. I’m getting excited about them. They’ve had a nice run. And now Toronto FC are gonna make some waves.

GM: Is the downsize of the coverage comedy gets in Britain that you say one thing and then there are a bunch of articles about you retiring?
SF: That’s disappointing to hear that you’ve seen articles. I will retire. It’s just inaccurate. Hopefully it won’t do any damage.

GM: You say you’re hanging out with rock stars and royalty.
SF: Yes!

GM: Is that an exaggeration or true?
SF: Famous people know me. That’s kinda weird.

GM: Like?
SF: Uh… I can’t name names.

GM: Come on. Throw me a bone.
SF: Um… You almost got his name. One of them. Bone. Rock star. Bone?

GM: I don’t know.
SF: Bono.

GM: Oh!
SF: The other one was Roger Daltry. I did a gig for him at the Royal Albert, as you do. He’s the patron for a charity. I think it’s Children in Need. So backstage there’s other performers there and I went over and introduced myself to him and he said, ‘I know who you are.’ He was frustrated by the fact that I would dare to… But you can never assume. And one of the princes is a fan of mine. Not Prince, but a prince, came over to me after a night where I was supporting Ricky Gervais. He was a fan of mine and he was recounting some of my jokes and I introduced him to my wife and he said, ‘Oh, you are Scottish!’ That was one of our favourite moments in show business. I’ve met Ben Guyat in Canada.

GM: Who’s that?
SF: He’s the host of Comedy at Club 54.

GM: Oh, that’s right!
SF: So I’ve met him. That’s my equivalent [in Canada]. And I met Al Waxman the day Bruno Gerussi died.

GM: So you’re connected to Canadian royalty, too.
SF: I think so. It was weird to meet one television legend the day the other one died.

GM: Maybe you’ll meet Brent Butt the day Al Waxman dies.
SF: Oh, wow.

GM: Or has he already died?
SF: Oh, see what you’ve done? I don’t know. I don’t want any part of this.

GM: You opened for Ricky Gervais when?
SF: That was 2010 for 60 shows.

GM: That’s brave of him to put on a far superior comic in front of him.
SF: I reminded him of that multiple times. But that’s just how confident the man is. Yeah, it was great.

GM: He’s not really a standup, is he? He became one.
SF: Well, he is. It’s all there. Set-up, punch. He is a standup in that sense. He’s not in the truest sense of the word. He kind of ventured into it after he established himself as a television star.

GM: Is he good?
SF: Yes. Yeah. I only saw the tour that I did. I think that was like his fourth tour. It’s all there. It was difficult for me to be a support act because no one wants to see a support act. So I’d have fun with that and I was cheeky and all that kind of stuff. But we determined, did Ricky and I, the reason it wasn’t quite as magical as I’d hoped it would be because I was establishing myself over here. And we reckon it wasn’t anything to do with the fact it was me but that people were coming out to see Ricky and they weren’t really comedy fans; they were fans of Ricky Gervais, this global superstar. There would be evenings where my act would suffer as a result. And his too, to a certain extent, because he’d come on and blow the roof off the place but if the auditorium’s not packed with comedy fans, it’s not going to be much fun for them.

GM: But the plus side is you’re playing to these huge crowds and to people who may not otherwise go see comedy and because you bang out the jokes, it would really increase your profile.
SF: He was grateful for that. He told me many times. He’s had a bunch of support acts and this was the best and for that reason. It set up the room. I did close to 20 minutes every night and it got them warmed up. The unfortunate thing is that there was an interval of 20 minutes to a half-hour. That kind of takes some of the momentum out of the room. But it was a great night for them and they got to see the legend that is Ricky Gervais. And hanging out with the man, that was a very unique experience to have that kind of five-star lifestyle and to see the man. He’s a genuinely nice fellow and very accommodating to his fans. He’s just a regular nice guy because, I think, success found him later in life. He was I think in his thirties when The Office became the hit that it became.

GM: And he’s a generous laugher, too.
SF: (chuckles) Yes, but it’s one of those kind of laughs that you just know he’s in the room so I don’t know how much of it is a natural laugh or how much of it was attention seeking. But yeah, you were definitely aware that he’s around.

GM: I think I got enough here, Stewart.
SF: Beautiful.

GM: It’s great talking to you. I look forward to seeing you at the show.
SF: Do you know what night you’re coming out?

GM: No.
SF: No. Listen to you!

GM: I may come all nights, I’m such a fan.
SF: It’s been a while since I’ve performed on stage. I’m just trying to figure out what I’m going to do. And I’ve got to change words back to the Canadian version.

GM: Otherwise you’ll just get blank stares.
SF: Exactly. Well, that’s kind of what I’m used to, in Vancouver in particular. It’s renowned for its laid-back audiences. That’s going to be an adjustment.

GM: Comedy’s gotten a lot more popular here in the last few years. The rooms are full and the crowds are hot.
SF: So they’re getting good audiences?

GM: Yeah. I hate to jinx that for you.
SF: No, that’s great. I’m looking forward to it. We feed off of that. It makes for a better evening.

GM: Totally.
SF: Okay-dokey, chum. I look forward to seeing you. And thanks for helping spread the word.

GM: Thanks very much.

SF: Okay, chum. Have a great day.

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Jan. 19: Peter 'n' Chris

Our first guests of 2014 are here! Our first guests of 2014 are here! Are you excited? They're not only first-timers on What's So Funny?, they're also homeboys. The three of us all went to the University of Victoria together. And by 'together', I mean at completely different times. I'm not sure what years they were there but I didn't see them when I was there. And I would have because as BMOC, everything centred around me.

Peter 'n' Chris also have surnames. Peter Carlone and Chris Wilson have only been performing sketch comedy together since 2009 but have already won a Canadian Comedy Award, been nominated for others, played the Just For Laughs festival and sketch festivals all around North America. And now they get to perform in Vancouver's very own Sketch Comedy Festival, which takes place Jan. 23-25. They have an in, though, since Carlone is the Artistic Director.

We'll talk about Peter, we'll talk about Chris, we'll talk about Peter 'n' Chris, and we'll talk about the festival. So tune in tonight at 11 pm PT to CFRO 100.5 in Vancouver. Or livestream the station at coopradio.org.

Saturday, January 4, 2014

2013 breakdown

I'm a little late with our 2013 breakdown. But only a little bit. Big thanks to all What's So Funny? guests last year.

We were a little light on the number of guested shows. In 2009, we did 42 shows with guests; in 2010 we had 38; in 2011 we had 44 (with a total of 53 guests thanks to some doubling up); and in 2012 we had 41 (with 47 total guests). This past year marked our low point, thanks to a summer of takin' it easy. But all in all, we finished with a respectable 35 shows (with a total of 37 guests). So big ups to the following, listed here in order of appearance:

  1. Paul Hooper
  2. Shirley Gnome
  3. Monica Hamburg
  4. Kyle Jones
  5. Gerry Swallow
  6. Dino Archie
  7. Sunee Dhaliwal
  8. Nelson Giles
  9. Hari Kondabolu
  10. Darren Frost
  11. Kenny Robinson
  12. Karen O'Keefe
  13. Matt Davis
  14. Marcus Ryan
  15. Shaun Majumder
  16. Mark Leiren-Young
  17. Darrin Rose
  18. Dave Merheje
  19. Kevin Foxx
  20. Kyle Bottom
  21. Steve Bays
  22. Jeff McEnery
  23. Ewan Currie
  24. Paul Anthony
  25. Ryan Hamilton
  26. Brian Regan
  27. Dave Nystrom
  28. Michael Gelbart
  29. Alan Zweig
  30. Godfrey
  31. Adam Ray
  32. Ian Harris
  33. Dave Martin
  34. Alex Nussbaum
  35. Ed Hill
  36. Marion Grodin
  37. Harry Doupe
Here's hoping our 2014 brings more awesome guests and scintillating conversation. Thanks for listening and Happy New Year.

Sunday, December 29, 2013

Dec. 29: Harry Doupe

It's Harry Doupe time again, boys and girls! What a great way to finish off another fine calendar year. I'll do the tallying up and list of guests in 2013 in the next day or two, but I think we'll clock in at 35, which is low for us but still a respectable number. Tonight, though, we'll catch up with Harry, who's moved back home after years and years and years (we'll find out just how many). We'll also find out how his Calgary baby, the YYComedy Festival, is going. And no doubt Harry will have some choice words about the industry he's been a part of for the past 30-odd years, as he always does. For years he gave the annual "Statelessness of the Industry" address at the Canadian Comedy Awards. He doesn't anymore, so this is his chance to get stuff off his chest!

So tune in tonight to CFRO, Vancouver Co-op Radio 100.5 FM at 11pm. That's Vancouver time, natch. Those of you cursed with living outside Metro Vancouver, you can always livestream us at coopradio.org. It's the next best thing to being here.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Episode 335ish: Marion Grodin

Two in one week! We're out of control. Yes, here's yet another podcast episode of What's So Funny? This one features Marion Grodin. The New York standup thinks I have an accent, not her! Now that's funny! While admiring my red shoes in her hotel suite, she told us all about her troubled youth filled with drugs and alcohol. We also hear some cool stories about her hanging out on the sets of some very famous movies her dad, Charles, starred in. Oh, and in case you don't pick up on this during the interview, she's written a book: Standing Up: A Memoir of a Funny (Not Always) Life.

So have a listen. As I mentioned in the last post, we're back up and running on iTunes (although this episode isn't yet up there as I write unless you subscribe to the show). We're also available on Stitcher. And PodcastLand. And right here.



Monday, December 16, 2013

Podcast episode 334ish: Ed Hill

Good news, people: We're back on iTunes. Did you miss us? Of course, iTunes being iTunes, our latest episode isn't there yet -- it usually takes a day or two so be patient. What you'll eventually get there (and what you can get right now below) is our episode with Ed Hill. It was his first visit to What's So Funny?, and Ed told us his story of emigrating to Canada from Taiwan, wrecking cars, travelling the world performing comedy, taking the infamous comedy seminar with Kyle Cease and Louie Anderson, and a bunch more.

As I say, have a listen here. Another immediate option is PodcastLand. Or go check it out on iTunes or Stitcher within the next day or two.



Sunday, December 15, 2013

Dec. 15: Marion Grodin

Tonight on radio we've got the only guest, so far as I know, who was told to get into standup by none other than Robert DeNiro. Not sure any other guest we've had can claim that. Or anyone else, period. Marion Grodin was in town in support of her book Standing Up: A Memoir of a Funny (Not Always) Life, where she talks about overcoming such hurdles as drug addiction, divorce, cancer, growing into her own person, and growing up the daughter of a celebrity. Okay, that last one was pretty sweet as her dad is the great actor, and hilarious dude, Charles Grodin. With a father like him, it's no wonder she got into standup comedy. We'll cover all those topics tonight.

It all starts at 11 pm PT on CFRO, Vancouver Co-op Radio 100.5 FM. If you're outside the city, you can livestream us at coopradio.org. Or you can simply wait a week and download the podcast when it comes out (and good news: we're back on iTunes!).

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Dec. 8: Ed Hill

The listeners have been clamouring for a live in-studio guest and tonight they get their wish. Okay, one listener called in and asked when we'd have a live guest again, but I'm sure he represented thousands of other listeners. Checking the records, I see our last live one was September 22 when Ryan Hamilton paid us a visit. Tonight we've got a local boy making his first ever What's So Funny? appearance. Local by way of Taiwan, actually, but it's been 18 years so we're safe in saying he's from Vancouver. He is, as his website tells us, "100% Canasian." Ed Hill has a new CD out and we'll play a track or two from it tonight. And we'll find out all there is to know about the man. For instance, I didn't know until right now that Ed has performed in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, San Francisco, Chapel Hill (North Carolina), and Boston. I'm sure I'll find out more tonight. As will you.

We're on the air at 11 pm PT on CFRO, Vancouver Co-op Radio 100.5 FM. Livestream us at coopradio.org. Go ahead, I dare you.

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Podcast episode 333ish: Alex Nussbaum

Alex Nussbaum made his What's So Funny? debut last week. In case you missed it, or if you just wanted to download it for posterity, here's the podcast version. We talked about being shamefully unilingual, Hebrew school vs public school, growing up a nerd in the traditional sense of the word, why Los Angeles beats out Toronto, making silly voices for a living, and how he just can't quit standup. Lots more, too.

We still haven't resolved the iTunes conundrum so don't look for us there yet. But we're on Stitcher now, if that helps (give us a rating, too. That also helps). Also I just found it on musicgoal.com. And, of course, our host comedycouch.com is where you'll find all past episodes.